Doesn't someone have to make an official complaint first Eli? So far people seem reluctant to do that. Perhaps they are still gathering evidence, or don't want to show their cards.
I guess that I'll have to try and be a patient bunny for once.
Eli Rabett is a not quite failed professorial techno-bunny, a chair election from retirement, at a wanna be research university that has a lot to be proud of but has swallowed the Kool-Aid. The students are naive but great and the administrators vary day-to-day between homicidal and delusional. His colleagues are smart, but they have a curious inability to see the holes that they dig for themselves. Prof. Rabett is thankful that they occasionally heed his pointing out the implications of the various enthusiasms that rattle around the department and school. Ms. Rabett is thankful that Prof. Rabett occasionally heeds her pointing out that he is nuts.
6 comments:
Funny droppings, Mr. Rabett and more bunny powers to DC!
--cynicus
Personally, I find it tasteless.
//Hvordan
Well, it is slightly inaccurate.
About 10 pages of the Wegman Report have some or most content that is "strikingly similar" to text from 3 separate textbooks and 2 Wikipedia pages.
Three people (Wegman, Scott, Said) signed off on this. Exactly who did what is not yet publicly known, and DC is usually careful to say so.
To be fair, it would be hard to fit that into a cartoon.
Wegman testified under oath and represented the report as the product of himself, Scott and Said. That makes it perjury.
Eli is right. Will USDoJ prosecute? Will George Mason University hold a hearing?
Doesn't someone have to make an official complaint first Eli? So far people seem reluctant to do that. Perhaps they are still gathering evidence, or don't want to show their cards.
I guess that I'll have to try and be a patient bunny for once.
MapleLeaf
Post a Comment