Sunday, August 11, 2019

The Foote Effect

Some time ago, being defined as about nine years, in his sorely missed Climate Abyss, John Niesen Gammon advocated doing away with the term greenhouse effect, or greenhouse gas, perhaps tongue in cheek, perhaps not

Okay, I’m finally convinced.

I hereby declare the greenhouse effect to be nonexistent.

There’s not much worse for public knowledge of science than an important but complex phenomenon whose very name evokes a false analogy. Such is the case with the greenhouse effect.
Now Eli thinks it was more to having to deal with sniping from the stands, but, be that as it may, John had a suggestion
Naturally, we know lots more about such gases now, including the importance of the wide range of temperature, pressure, and density conditions that accompany their presence in the atmosphere. But Tyndall was the first, and so the “effect formerly known as greenhouse” can properly be called the “Tyndall effect”.

But that name is already taken. It refers to the wavelength dependence of light scattering by tiny (sub-micron) particles suspended in an otherwise transparent medium. So that won’t do. Using the same term for two different phenomena would be, I don’t know, like using the term “greenhouse effect” to refer to what keeps greenhouses warm and at the same time use it to refer to what keeps the Earth warm. And wouldn’t that be stupid?

But, not to fear, there’s nothing in science that’s presently known as a “Tyndall gas“. So this term can immediately replace the term “greenhouse gas” to refer to gases that are much more opaque to infrared wavelengths than to visible wavelengths.

A replacement for the term “greenhouse gas” is especially useful since only a small fraction of the gases that fill greenhouses are greenhouse gases. This makes “greenhouse gas” a double misnomer. Wow.

And then, the EFKAG can be renamed more transparently (sorry) as the Tyndall gas effect.

So be it. Henceforth I shall use the terms “Tyndall gas” and “Tyndall gas effect” whenever the opportunity presents itself, or at least until such time as a suitable alternative name comes into broader usage.
John kept it up for quite a while, as Eli recalls until he left the building down at the Houston Chronicle.

Before we go on, it is probably worthwhile pointing out that what Tyndall found was the absorption of Tyndall gases in the IR at longer wavelengths than 3 microns or so shown in red below


Recently, maybe a year ago, an 1856 report by Edith Eunice Newton Foote to the AAAS national meeting has come to light in which she observed the heating effect of sunlight (shown by the blue line in the figure to the left above) on various gases including CO2 and water vapor in a sealed glass tube.  Eli pointed out that since the glass tube cut off the solar spectrum (which is relatively weak there) at about 3 microns, Foote did not observe the basis of the greenhouse effect Tyndall gas effect, which is the absorption of thermal radiation from the surface (shown by the dotted line in the figure to the right).

What she did observe is the absorption by water vapor and carbon dioxide shown in green by the bands above 0.7 microns, and maybe down to about 0.3 which are primarily due to aerosol scattering.  Since she did experiments with water and thus water vapor in her glass cells, this would not be unlikely.

This absorption, the difference between the blue and green lines above 0.3 microns, has an important practical significance:  It is responsible for the absorption of approximately 79 W/m2 in the atmosphere and should a bunny care to include it the 100 W/m2 scattered back into space


Nielsen-Gammon pointed out that there is a long tradition, which he was following, of naming an effect after its discoverer.

Thus the absorption and scattering of visible and near IR light in the atmosphere should henceforth be known as the Foote Effect or the Foote Gas Effect

7 comments:

jgnfld said...

How about: Rabett's Foote Law?

Barton Paul Levenson said...

"Greenhouse effect" is so set in the literature it's folly to try to change it now. "Planetary nebulae" have nothing to do with planets, but try changing that name.

THE CLIMATE WARS said...

Let's scap the confusing acronyms and call the core issue :

Tyndall Doubling Sensitivity


The late Sir John ( Tyndall, not Maddox ) deserves to be remembered for so precociously bringing these matters to Parliamentary attention.

David B. Benson said...

:)

dave said...

Poor Edith Foote, completely forgotten these days, and all the credit given to the (related?) [[Eunice Newton Foote]] who is reported as writing a remarkably similar paper in 1856, though a gentleman had to present it on her behalf because sexism.

Her discovery looks well worth commemorating, unfortunately in Scots there is already a process known as Footering, akin to prevarication to put it nicely, a term more appropriate for a widespread political response to global warming.

We can but hope that the Foote Effect doesn't get mixed up with Footering.

Dave Bunny

THE CLIMATE WARS said...

Dave Bunny:

No footering please- both the glass cylinder and the glass thermometer Foote employed were as opaque to the infrared wavelengths CO2 absorbs and emits as a greenhouse roof, and both trapped thermal energy radiated by the gas- she ended up measuring gas thermal conductivity as much as IR optical depth.

Bill Nye had a similar problem with the jar full of CO2 in his inconclusive TV experiment, and Tyndall was the first to solve it by introducing infrared transparent rock salt windows on IR reflective metal tubes.

Kudos to Foote for trying, but it was the dab lab hand Tyndall who suceeded-

EliRabett said...

Seems to be Eli's day in the barrel. Corrected.