So Eli and Ms. Eli are bundling up for the end of May holiday here in the US and Ethon thought he would take a whack or a peck as the case may be. This one starts with the set to between Richard Tol (boo, hiss) and Dana Nuccetelli (yea) covered at places which are dangerous but it really is about reading carefully. You can see their tweets at Twitter, but Eli's friend @Ethon Raptor wants to point to two of them
Richard Tol Tol, of course, like Lucia's friend, misses the point that there are differences between abstracts and papers, something Eli and Dana have been hammering at.
Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.
Dana Nuccitelli But, dear bunnies, how can it be that Cook et al, missed those 112 papers that Tol whines about? (Hint read the methods in the Cook et al. paper)
@RichardTol I already elaborated twice. On top of the abstract/paper issue you suggested it was a fault our sample only included 10 of yours
Pielke class meltdown to follow.