The Rabett hole
The place where word salad goes to wilt.
Recent Comments
Subscribe Rabett Run
Posts
Comments
Contributors
Eli Rabett
Brian's Other Blogs
On Line Textbooks
Mostly Science
- AGW Observer
- Arthur Smith
- Bob Grumbine in the 21st Century
- Capital Climate
- Coby Beck + H.E. Taylor
- Deep Climate
- Easterbrook's Serendipity
- James' Empty Blog
- John Nielsen-Gammon
- Neven's Artic Sea Ice Blog
- Nick Stoke's Moyhu
- Real Climate
- Science of Doom
- Simon Donner's Maribo
- Tamino's Open Mind
- The Weasel, aka Stoat
- Things Break
- Weather from Bridford, Devon, a beautiful corner of the world
Mostly Climate Policy
Jörg Zimmermann Global Klima
Southerners
Cuter in Bunny Ears
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(187)
-
►
May
(39)
- Empathy First
- Canute Sets π = 3
- FEV2Gen to support V2G
- Judith Curry Thinks Plans to Kill Her Colleagues A...
- Scrotum Returns
- Latest update on our friends at Heartland
- Petroleum and Propaganda
- Hide the Bunnies
- Natural Variability Is Not the Lukewarmers Friend
- California climate offsets and additionality
- The Weasel Gets To Get His Fix
- Mad Crowd Sourcing Climate Science Experiments for...
- Steve Napalms Another Tree
- Even Evil Has Standards
- I Used To Be Called a Heartland Expert
- Dems reforming filibusters, Repubs abandoning no n...
- A New Blog on the Blogspot
- On Economics
- Galileo or Bozo, a binary choice
- James Hansen Doubles Down
- Grandpa Jumps the Curve
- Jumping the Hockey Stick Doesn't Break It
- Chance for Anthony Watts to show his worth
- UAH satellite temps being corrected by others. Kn...
- Onward to apartheid in Greater Israel
- Guilt, Culpability and Responsibility
- The Commenters are Smarter Than the Posters
- Eli Can Retire Part XII: The Australian Department...
- Brad Johnson Pins the Contributions on Heartland
- Stolen thought of the day, plus riffs
- Billboards are just repeats of garbage on Heartlan...
- Heartland Seppuku
- Heartland Hacked Again
- Time to set up the American Business Chamber
- Keith Kloor highlights his own strawman; can't see...
- The Climate Casino
- But There's More
- EINAL
- Buying and closing coal mines to benefit climate
-
►
April
(34)
- Citizens United's worst impact will be where you c...
- Skinny people dieting to reduce human biomass
- Decoupling
- As Richard Alley was saying
- How to Widen the Overton Window After the Dragons ...
- The Uncertainty Monster Swallows the Sky Dragon
- Harvard Leads the Way
- Woy is Wong
- Roger Pielke Jr. Will Be So Sad
- Give this guy a job in politics (UPDATE: Kobayashi...
- Eli Is a Straightforward Bunny
-
►
May
(39)
Nil Nisi
Technorati
48 comments:
Anonymous said...
Eli, you know it all adds up---Oh no...)
Okay, you know I like what this man says, he has good traction on this road we are all on. I thank God, that he does not appear too often, my head would pop. If you are able to overcome ADD long enough to comprehend what this guy said... I gotta hand it to you. Where will we all be, when we finally get the check? Now, for those with sage advice for us the unwashed,... what's up?
http://www.kitco.com/ind/willie/jan132011.html
We will all die some day---
& it will be to our credit
too
buy-buy?:o)
Anonymous said...
Let's see now... Mr David B. Benson, Were you going to say sex, or is there some new word, from COO:} world? If John Mashey is right and a-meson, is not lying; I might be able to purchase chapter eight... so much for a land of plenty.
don't be lewd, it's crewed
time to fly
bye-by---
14/1/11 10:04 PM
Anonymous said...
Mr. Dhogaza get his tin hat now, too. Give One to A__ray... E_t al.
13/1/11 6:06 AM
Anonymous said...
Like you guys are always sayin... "It is always about the distribution..." What a picture.) This or that, what's left?:o)
fly-bye
sigh
8/1/11 1:00 PM
Antiquated Tory,Speaking for myself may I say to you... Toot Toot.
Atom
Anonymous said...
Jakermen:
Stop being a fucking drama queen with this 10 billion years of GDP caper, you religious nutcase. If you can't answer the question fuck off and stop wasting pixels. You know it adds to AGW.
18/1/11 1:40 AM
Jakerman said...
Fred (aka frustrated potty mouth) I had no idea this left you so sore:
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/01/tolgate.php#comment-3124833
18/1/11 2:02 AM
This is a first. Jam thinks rich people can't pay more for nature preservation.
Hey Jam, are you a Democrat?
I'm asking as honestly as I can because your comment appears to have serious logical flaws and full of emotive junk that we can only expect from the political party recently made much smaller.
18/1/11 9:20 AM
Anonymous said...
Oh Jeez Jam is wetting his pants again watching a rerun of 2012 where the monk get lifted off the mountain by a giant wave. Someone, please call 911.
Shorter, Jakerman.
"I'm a ignorant dick".
I can't try harder with you, jakerman, as you're too stupid to understand.
18/1/11 11:09 PM
For Christ sake you moron, the 1% cost of mitigation is 1% of GGDP. It's not 1% of consumption, that is unless you think 1% of 100 - 1% of 50, which wouldn't shock me for a liberal arts grad.
You really are stupid.
19/1/11 12:18 AM
More Martie stupidity:
"Sigh, someone else with reading comprehension issues. Use the formula Luke: the 1% is 1% of GGDP. Taken off the consumption part of GGDP. Rather than eating up the seed grains, so to speak, which most farmers will tell you is not a good idea. "
Martie, lets try an exercise. 1% of 100 = 1. 1% of 50 =.5
If you want to express it as 1/50, then that equals 2%
You really are a from a mediocre liberal arts school, you big mouth.
19/1/11 12:24 AM
Jeff:
Nothing personal, but you have nothing to add here. You are not an economist had no economic training. What you are is a religious fruitcake posing as some sort of reasonable person. You are neither and if Jim Jones were alive today he'd look at you as either a blood brother or a fierce competitor.
If you have anything to say, point to the facts or STFU and go away, as I have little time for people like you.
19/1/11 3:02 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 3:02 am:
"Nothing personal, but you have nothing to add here. You are not an economist had no economic training. What you are is a religious fruitcake posing as some sort of reasonable person. You are neither and if Jim Jones were alive today he'd look at you as either a blood brother or a fierce competitor."
Then Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 4:12 am
"People: Please try to stick to what this thread is supposed to be about (economics) and not the individuals: who they are and if you like them or not. Stop behaving like angry little betas and focus on the topic..."
19/1/11 4:19 AM
"Well he knows that if the environment collapses, you won't have an economy--which puts him a lot higher on the IQ curve than you."
Like not get out of bed in the morning scared stiff he might be hit by a bus 100 miles away.
Please continue. You are only increasing Jeff's credibility by opposing him."
Yea right.
"Put another way: First, bound the risk. "
You ought to be "bound", in a strait jacket.
19/1/11 9:14 AM
a_ray_in_dilbert_space said...
Jeff,
Now you have me baffled. What comes in a pile, could possibly refer to Anonym-Ass and has six letters. I can think of something with 7 letters that would modify the adjective "crazy" to describe him. He is certainly lower than snake****, dumber than owl**** and full of bull****, but my knowledge of the scatological only goes so far, and this particular troll surpasses it.
19/1/11 7:05 AM
Mash.
Go to bed, You need some sleep. After suggesting you would apply negative time preference (saying so) in the middle of the day your insomnia is really effecting you.
19/1/11 12:40 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon, BTW if you really really want to prove you are not Fred Knell why not point me to some of your other recent posts on blogs?
But I don't see why anon should be so annoyed at being called Fred.
Thanks for the fun anyway Fred.
19/1/11 2:22 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon, BTW if you really really want to prove you are not Fred Knell why not point me to some of your other recent posts on blogs?
But I don't see why anon should be so annoyed at being called Fred.
Thanks for the fun anyway Fred.
19/1/11 2:22 AM
Anonymous said...
Jerkerman..
Fine. if it makes you happy. I'm Fred. I'm not, but that won't make you happy trying to figure out who I am and I'm here to make you happy, Jerkerman.
19/1/11 3:04 AM
Anonymous said...
If it weren't for the slightly higher level of coherence in language usage, I be speculating that "anonymous" is Graeme Bird.
Perhaps he is Neil Craig. Tim Curtin?
So many nuts in the fruitcake...
Bernard J. Hyphen-Anonymous XVII.
19/1/11 3:25 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon (with a wounded Fred Knell's MO) writes:
"Nothing personal, but you have nothing to add here. You are not an economist had no economic training. What you are is a religious fruitcake posing as some sort of reasonable person. You are neither and if Jim Jones were alive today he'd look at you as either a blood brother or a fierce competitor."
More stunning huberious from the same person who claims to know what Stern's findings were, only to expose himself an sorely wrong.
Keep it up Knelly, you've built quite the reputation (for exposing your self). I'm sure Tol is appreciative of the type of support you provide (not).
19/1/11 3:43 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon gets more bipolar:
Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 3:02 am:
"Nothing personal, but you have nothing to add here. You are not an economist had no economic training. What you are is a religious fruitcake posing as some sort of reasonable person. You are neither and if Jim Jones were alive today he'd look at you as either a blood brother or a fierce competitor."
Then Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 4:12 am
"People: Please try to stick to what this thread is supposed to be about (economics) and not the individuals: who they are and if you like them or not. Stop behaving like angry little betas and focus on the topic..."
Anon (with Fred Knell’s MO) at 4:23 am
“Do you understand that now, you ignoramus? There's nothing worse than liberal arts majors skulking around trying to sound all knowledgeable about these things except IT majors. Stick to the Iliad and let the grown ups speak.”
Wow!.
19/1/11 4:32 AM
Jeff Harvey said...
IMO anon is Knell alright. His maniacal musings have been more-or-less banned from Deltoid, so he's popped up over here instead. I think, Eli, you ought to throw this clown out, pronto.
Anon (Knell) writes, "Here's the thing, I've have no science training".
That's about the most honest revelation he's made. Everything else is garbage. The other day, before Tim Lambert rightfully scrambled his gibberish, he tried to downplay my resposte by claiming that my scientific publications were in journals that were the caliber of "Reader's Digest". That's strange, since I have more citation so my work than his heroes do and the journals I have published in include Nature, PNAS, Ecology Letters, TREE, Ecology, etc. I am sure that Richard will even recognize that stature of these journals.
Truth is anon (Knell) has never picked up an ecology paper in his life and he expects readers here to think he can accurately predict the cost of losing biodiversity after 99% has already been extirpated? Get real. He ought to pack and and leave before he makes an even bigger idiot of himself. Anyone who think that human welfare depends exclusively on the physical environment is living in cloud cuckoo land.
Yet, for some innane reason, anon (= Knell) thinks he can add something to a debate about the economic costs of climate change whilst ignoring ecological aspects. I'd like to ask him how he thinks human society would do if all pollinators, nutrient cycling organisms, and other vital functional groups were amongst the 99% to go. I expect for him to reply that humans will thrive even if the planet were covered in concrete. This is the level of stupidity we are dealing with here folks. An arrogant, scientific illiterate who thinks he knows it all.
19/1/11 4:43 AM
Jakerman said...
Jeff, we might be right about Knell, but while Knell and Anon share some similarities Anon political reference are to Democrats, while Knell's were Australian.
Still if they are not the same its an amazing coincidence to meet such alike bloggers, with alike tactics, and attacks, and errors. And to meeting them on the same Tol topic with in a week.
Maybe Tol's work just attracts a certain character? Poor Tol.
19/1/11 4:55 AM
Jakerman said...
Oh it looks like Anon at 4:12 was an anomally:
Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 3:02 am:
"Nothing personal, but you have nothing to add here. You are not an economist had no economic training. What you are is a religious fruitcake posing as some sort of reasonable person. You are neither and if Jim Jones were alive today he'd look at you as either a blood brother or a fierce competitor."
Then Anon (with Fred Knell's MO) at 4:12 am
"People: Please try to stick to what this thread is supposed to be about (economics) and not the individuals: who they are and if you like them or not. Stop behaving like angry little betas and focus on the topic..."
Anon (with Fred Knell’s MO) at 4:23 am
“Do you understand that now, you ignoramus? There's nothing worse than liberal arts majors skulking around trying to sound all knowledgeable about these things except IT majors. Stick to the Iliad and let the grown ups speak.”
Anon (being his self) at 5:00am:
"Look you religious nut ball this isn't your website and the discussion has nothing you could add. Just go away and do some Jim Jones impersonations, you unhinged creep."
19/1/11 5:09 AM
Anonymous said...
Jeff Jim Jones Harvey says:
"IMO anon is Knell alright. His maniacal musings have been more-or-less banned from Deltoid, so he's popped up over here instead. I think, Eli, you ought to throw this clown out, pronto."
Of Course, you would say that Jeff Jim Jones Harvey, you clown.
"That's about the most honest revelation he's made. Everything else is garbage."
Unlike you I don't venture into stuff I don't know and leave it to people that do. You seem to twist that all around when I pointed out that I leave the science to the scientists and I haven’t made any scientific claims except one, a medical one in that you seem to have all the traits of a religious nut like Jones.
You wouldn’t know the difference between GDP and GOP yet venture into this discussion like a typical troll.
Look you religious nut ball this isn't your website and the discussion has nothing you could add. Just go away and do some Jim Jones impersonations, you unhinged creep.
Ecology major. Is that a serious degree or a make believe for people unable to do anything else?
19/1/11 5:00 AM
Jakerman said...
Anon (with Knell's MO) wites:
"Unlike you I don't venture into stuff I don't know and leave it to people that do."
Evidence on this thread suggest otherwise.
19/1/11 5:11 AM
a_ray_in_dilbert_space said...
Jeff,
Now you have me baffled. What comes in a pile, could possibly refer to Anonym-Ass and has six letters. I can think of something with 7 letters that would modify the adjective "crazy" to describe him. He is certainly lower than snake****, dumber than owl**** and full of bull****, but my knowledge of the scatological only goes so far, and this particular troll surpasses it.
19/1/11 7:05 AM
Arc Light...
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/17/scientists-trying-to-clone-resurrect-extinct-mammoth/?hpt=T2
http://digg.com/news/science/good_looking_men_and_women_have_higher_iqs_beauty_and_brains_do_go_together
http://blogs.jta.org/politics/article/2011/01/10/2742483/is-loughners-mother-jewish
http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Local%20News/Police-seize-guns-after-Los-Alamos-standoff
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100072360/warmists-we-cant-win-the-game-so-lets-change-the-rules/
From Wikipedia, “Crimestop is a Newspeak term taken from the novel 1984 by George Orwell. It means to rid oneself of unwanted thoughts, i.e., thoughts that interfere with the ideology of the Party. This way, a person avoids committing thoughtcrime.”
Party leader Emmanuel Goldstein defined the word this way:
Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/8267768/World-needs-100-trillion-more-credit-says-World-Economic-Forum.html
http://www.jacksonsun.com/article/20101226/COLUMNISTS01/12260306/2010--The-good--the-bad-and-the-unfortunate
John Mashey:
Explain your anti-reason approach in applying negative time preference and while there also explain how this would be a way of conserving rather than consuming resources.
You do realize that by applying a negative time preference you would in effect by inducing people to consume more in the present, right?
Anonymous said...
Dhogaza:
Interesting to see you here too. I see your pathetic name but don't read your scrawls at almost every extremist website in the country. Flick open the website and there's D. Hogaza there in the comments section. What an ass you are.
As for pay-grades. I would be assuming you're so busy commenting at realclimate that it doesn't offer a chance for a full time job. So which disability pension are you on, you creep?
20/1/11 4:26 PM
It is nice when you love your mother & are almost just like her?:o)
EliRabett said...
"Mom Rabett was the last of the first grade dragons, and she always used to shake her head about parents' choices in educating their children. To hear the average discourse, parents should be totally free to make all choices for their kids, but in reality many, maybe even most do not have the information they need to do so, nor the tools that they need to make the best choices, nor do they all know this, nor do they know how to seek out the information and help they need. Which, of course, is not a modern dilemma."...
May I say to ya, what a picture.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DEoOdcYKbc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcW_Ygs6hm0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9ihKq34Ozc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KvgtEnABY&feature=related
http://www.kitco.com/ind/willie/oct062010.html
13/10/10 10:01 AM
RR Kampen NL,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1xyNYphlGA
14/10/10 8:34 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/8125127/Giant-space-bubbles-baffle-astronomers.html
11/11/10 2:45 PM
Hmmm, talk about some Light reading... Peter's observation in II Peter, 3:8; & now it only takes 27 Heavenly days to complete One circuit of the galactic meridian... How big are you now?:o)
12/11/10 9:52 AM
Perhaps they are the Higgs-Boson: 'The officer in charge of a ship's rigging, anchors, cables, and deck crew.' You know, the One, that all of science, seems to be searching for?
Atom
12/11/10 1:00 PM
Anonymous said...
'POE'; The Seiche Well
James; 4:14---now, some time ago & then...again?:o)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rd8mzSQUkY&feature=related
17/11/10 11:17 AM
More & more fun, for everyone:)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTUY16CkS-k
18/12/10 6:26 PM
Geo. engineering ):-tOO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOjckJWqb0A
3-7-8-9-10...the end
3/1/11 8:00 AM
Sorry, no pictures & for the dim lites...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvrb7YqdvxE
About 2, he'd say...?:o)
no-way-joe
26/1/11 6:55 AM
Yo Buck, now you got some real trail cred... way to go thumper?:o)
Open Mind & History...
re-write
All good things must someday end. Look for each other and wave if you can;'O' well. See ya.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4VlruVG81w
Bye-bye.
Hey Tommy dear, how about owning up to your numerous lies about your naval service first? :-)
Posted by Anonymous to Rabett Run at 29/1/11 9:42 PM
All good things must someday end. Look for each other and wave if you can;'O' well. See ya.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4VlruVG81w
Bye-bye.
Cut to: int. War Room
DeSadeski:
You've obviously never heard of cobalt thorium G.
Turgidson:
No, what about it?
DeSadeski:
Cobalt thorium G has a radioactive halflife of ninety three years. If you take, say, fifty H-bombs in the hundred megaton range and jacket them with cobalt thorium G, when they are exploded they will produce a doomsday shroud. A lethal cloud of radioactivity which will encircle the earth for ninety three years!
Turgidson:
Ah, what a load of commie bull. I mean, afterall...
Post a Comment