Troll of the weak before
In which art imitates life at Rabett Run
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Eli meant to behave but there were way too many options.
KoFi Button
Posts
Contributors
Eli Rabett
Eli Rabett, a not quite failed professorial techno-bunny who finally handed in the keys and retired from his wanna be research university. The students continue to be naive but great people and the administrators continue to vary day-to-day between homicidal and delusional without Eli's help. Eli notices from recent political developments that this behavior is not limited to administrators. His colleagues retain their curious inability to see the holes that they dig for themselves. Prof. Rabett is thankful that they, or at least some of them occasionally heeded his pointing out the implications of the various enthusiasms that rattle around the department and school. Ms. Rabett is thankful that Prof. Rabett occasionally heeds her pointing out that he is nuts.
Brian's Other Blog
On Line Textbooks
- Atmospheric Chemistry - Daniel Jacob
- Environmental Geosciences - Robert Stewart
- Ray Pierrehumbert on the physics of climate
- David Archer's Global Warming (Parts)
- Spencer Weart's Disovery of Global Warming
- Stratospheric Ozone
- Global Land Vegetation
- Polar Sea Ice
- Sea Surface Temperatures
- Skeptical Science - not a book but a resource
Mostly Science
- And Then There's Physics
- Blue Skies Research - J&J in the UK
- Bob Grumbine in the 21st Century
- Easterbrook's Serendipity
- Izen or Izen it not?
- James' Empty Blog
- Neven's Artic Sea Ice Blog
- Nick Stoke's Moyhu
- Real Climate
- Science of Doom
- Simon Donner's Maribo II
- Tamino's Open Mind
- The Weasel, aka Stoat
- Victor Venema
- Weather from Bridford, Devon, a beautiful corner of the world
Mostly Climate Policy
Other Lands
Southerners
Cuter in Bunny Ears
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(252)
-
▼
May
(17)
- Troll of the weak before
- Ups and downs
- UVa spits back
- Eli can retire Part XIII - Tom Segalstad is an old...
- The Judith Curry Debunking Room is open
- Slippery slopes
- Offend everyone day
- Whan that Aprill with its cold snap sorta
- More arrogant physicists
- Eli can retire Part XII - The commenters get somet...
- The very dry, very adiabatic lapse rate
- Gavin Schmidt can retire Part I - The EPA sticks i...
- Unto us a paper is given, unto us a refutation is ...
- This is the Environmental Protection Agency, Divis...
- Rabett Reader
- Eli can Retire Part XI - A bunch of denial denied
- Cuccinelli Covers Up Virtue
-
▼
May
(17)
Nil Nisi
- A Few Things Illconsidered
- Arthur Smith
- Atmoz
- Capital Climate
- Chris Colose
- Climate Physics Forum
- Cruel Mistress
- Deep Climate
- Delayed Oscillator
- Deltoid
- Denis Delbecq
- Fergus Brown's Old Man
- Greenfyre
- Horatio's Muse
- John Nielsen-Gammon
- Lab Lemming
- Logical Science
- Magnus Westerstrand
- N3xus 6
- Policy Lass
- Post Normal Times
- Rick Piltze
- Some Are Boojums
- Throbgoblin
9 comments:
In other news, Anthony Watts is being classy as ever.
Let us preserve the memory of fallen soldiers. Let us not cheapen that spirit by weirdly connecting it with cheap personal taunts.
The bird is dead, long ears rule...
by-by
Oh now, the bird was quality trolling. Infuriatingly smug (his intellect unencumbered by any relevant knowledge), linker to some of the crappiest pseudo-science out there (the Moon pdf, which a bunny likened to a 4th grade class in the Bronze Age), poster of items that actually argue against his point but that he misunderstands, and even a religious crackpot! He is a Roc of birdy trolls, a +3HD Abyssal Dire Troll. His presence on this blog distinguishes it from any other climate science blog I've read, and possibly any other blog at all (though there are some contenders at Orac's place).
Btw, Pearls Before Swine rocks.
@Carrot eater
He only asked a question. The over-hyped reaction says a lot.
Tim Lambert is still deleting comments over at his blog that prove a major piece of his latest post as wrong. Gee I wonder how often that happens. In his Monckton Wrong" post he claims Monckton "lied" when he quoted box 10.2 of IPCC report. Well go to the link in Tim's article and you will find that Mockton was accurate and Tim is wrong!
"The mean ±1 standard deviation values from these models were 3.8°C ± 0.78°C in the SAR (17 models), 3.5°C ± 0.92°C in the TAR (15 models) and in this assessment 3.26°C ± 0.69°C (18 models)."
Note the words "in this assessment"..
Lambert is a CSP and has been for years.
Jon P (aka Celry Eater)
Snow Bunny says:
Eli, see the hilarious gobbledegook coming from the deniers this week:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Moon+Stefan+Boltzmann&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
in which they do in the Stefan-Boltzmann law so global warming isn't real!
(For those who don't know Stefan's law relates temperature and energy and has been around for 200 years.)
Jon P,
You somehow missed this part in Tim's post:
"Monckton's numbers do come from box 10.2, but are the mean and standard deviation of the sensitivity for 18 different climate models, which is not the same thing at all."
Monckton is comparing carrots and celery.
A field rabbit has moved into my neighborhood.
I named it Eli.
We are honored
"What are you doing pig?"
:)
Post a Comment