Eli meant to behave but there were way too many options.
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Nuff Said
OK,
Blogger Profile has his own personal thread. BP and anybunny else who wants to expose themselves can post here. If BP or his next version comments elsewhere, they will be deleted
And you, Eli, you defend Buddy Dumdum's bullshit arguments proves that your problem, despite pointing out the BS arguments of deniers, isn't the stupidity of their argument but that they don't agree that AGW is real. You don't WANT better arguments form deniers,you don't CARE about crap arguments. You just want agreement.
So you can fuck off. And tell your Mrs she can fuck off too.
Managing a 100-percent renewable grid, without batteries http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/11/managing-a-100-percent-renewable-grid-without-batteries/ Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/11/18/1510028112.abstract
Usual suspect Mark Jacobson at it again.
I'm sort of waiting on the NREL/NAE/NAS/DOD consensus study due out in the next year or fiddy combined with an actual 100% prototype proof-of-concept demonstration.
Maybe we can do 100% renewable with no-low wind, no-low batteries, no-low moonlight and no-low hydro.
Is Jacobson running for POTUS?
DOD would call this one 6.1 monies (basic research) and the prototype demonstration would be 6.3 monies.
UPDATE: The spambots got clever so the verification is back. Apologies
Some of the regulars here are having trouble telling the anonymice apart. Please add some distinguishing name to your comment such as Mickey, Minnie, Mighty, or Fred.
Please don't do that. I'm writing my PhD thesis on "abnormal psychology diagnosed through Internet trolling", and this dude is my main study subject.
ReplyDeleteI'm betting 10€ on the Russians.
Fuck of retard.
ReplyDeleteAnd you, Eli, you defend Buddy Dumdum's bullshit arguments proves that your problem, despite pointing out the BS arguments of deniers, isn't the stupidity of their argument but that they don't agree that AGW is real. You don't WANT better arguments form deniers,you don't CARE about crap arguments. You just want agreement.
So you can fuck off. And tell your Mrs she can fuck off too.
I don't think Eli was defending my arguments. I think he was objecting to your conduct. These are entirely different things.
ReplyDeleteManaging a 100-percent renewable grid, without batteries
ReplyDeletehttp://arstechnica.com/science/2015/11/managing-a-100-percent-renewable-grid-without-batteries/
Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/11/18/1510028112.abstract
Usual suspect Mark Jacobson at it again.
I'm sort of waiting on the NREL/NAE/NAS/DOD consensus study due out in the next year or fiddy combined with an actual 100% prototype proof-of-concept demonstration.
Maybe we can do 100% renewable with no-low wind, no-low batteries, no-low moonlight and no-low hydro.
Is Jacobson running for POTUS?
DOD would call this one 6.1 monies (basic research) and the prototype demonstration would be 6.3 monies.
> You don't WANT better arguments form deniers, you don't CARE about crap arguments.
ReplyDeleteNot sure about Eli or whoever that "you" is pointed at, but I do want better arguments for my Contrarian Matrix:
contrarianmatrix.wordpress.com
Do you have what it takes to make it into the Matrix, dear Profile?
What it takes is CITATIONS, it goes without saying.
Thank you for your concerns.