Cross Tabs

As Eli mentioned previously, the cross tabs have some of the most interesting information from the Prequel

The most interesting cross tabs in the prequel, now in the recovery room, were those that were put into the middle, the ones where at least one of the two bunnies that looked at an abstract though that the abstract fell into one of the five middle categories, discusses AGW (D), discusses methods (M), paleoclimate (P), unrelated to AGW (UR) or undecided (UD.  The crosstabs below are for the two ratings when one of them was in the middle categories.  EE and IE are explicitly endorses and IE is implicitly endorses.  Similarly IR and ER are implicitly rejects and explicitly rejects.  Two votes for a particular rating (e.g. D/D) were counted as two votes for that position

These are ONLY the cross-tabs for ratings that INCLUDED one of the middle categories.  These are NOT cross-tabs for cases where both raters agreed that the ABSTRACT either supported or rejected AGW.

Those are further below 

	D	EE	IE	M	P	UR	UD	IR	ER
D/EE	34	34
D/IE	75		75
D/D	110
D/IR	5							5
D/ER	2								2
D/M	17			17
D/P	6				6
M/M				24
M/EE			6	6
M/IE			17	17
M/IR				1				1
P/P					86
P/IE			6		6
P/M				7	7
P/IR					3			3
UR/UR						28
UR/EE		7				7
UR/IE			23			23
UR/D	8					8
UR/IR						1		1
UD/UD						2
UD/IE			3				3
UD/D	4						4
UD/IR							2	2
UD/M				1			1
	261	41	130	73	108	69	10	7	2

 

The telling thing about these cross-tabs is how few split votes there were for the rejectionist position, and on inspection of the actual abstracts, the number appears to be inflated. 

As to the affirm vs. reject side of the ratings, well, it ain't a contest

	D	EE	IE	M	P	UR	UD	IR	ER
EE/EE		102
EE/IE		125	125
IE/IE			128
IR/IR								4
IR/ER								3	3
ER/ER									4
		227	253					7	7

The generic 97%