Well, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists amended its position statement from oposition to the consensus climate science to neutrality in 2007. I think that indicates some integrity.
UPDATE: The spambots got clever so the verification is back. Apologies
Some of the regulars here are having trouble telling the anonymice apart. Please add some distinguishing name to your comment such as Mickey, Minnie, Mighty, or Fred.
Not even Tobis?
ReplyDeleteLoved that? You'll LOVE this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thersa.org/events/vision/vision-videos/bjorn-lomborg-tackling-global-warming-and-doing-good
[Bonus captcha irony: arifuse]
Speak for yourself; I'm in it for great gobs of cash, pure and simple. That and the flowers thrown at the feet by passers-by. And the babes of course.
ReplyDeleteAm I alone?
Yes. Esp. wrt the babes....
ReplyDeleteSorry, the fame, cash and babes go the evolutionists.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaGgpGLxLQw
Dr. Rabett,
ReplyDeleteAre you guessing at sea ice this year?
They're probably not in it for the threats, either:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/05/hate-mail-climategate
John Puma
Presumably "they" are not in it for the threats, either.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/05/hate-mail-climategate
John Puma
Coal geologists are in it for the gold- six figure salaries straight out of undergrad.
ReplyDeleteWhat about oil geologists?
ReplyDeleteDave Benson asks, "What about oil geologists?"
ReplyDeleteWell, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists amended its position statement from oposition to the consensus climate science to neutrality in 2007. I think that indicates some integrity.