Maybe the Rabett has this list stuffed in his burrow:
is there a nice list somewhere of truly awful climate papers published in otherwise-plausible-looking journals? (I.e., not E&E, or JSE, or things like that.)
The main use of this is to know where peer review seems to be failing.
UPDATE: The spambots got clever so the verification is back. Apologies
Some of the regulars here are having trouble telling the anonymice apart. Please add some distinguishing name to your comment such as Mickey, Minnie, Mighty, or Fred.
He's up to something...
ReplyDeleteDoes this mean I now have to finish slogging my way through Singer's book before I take it back to the library?
ReplyDeleteMaybe the Rabett has this list stuffed in his burrow:
ReplyDeleteis there a nice list somewhere of truly awful climate papers published in otherwise-plausible-looking journals? (I.e., not E&E, or JSE, or things like that.)
The main use of this is to know where peer review seems to be failing.