These thoughts were reinforced a couple of weeks ago talking to Eli Lehrer from R Street at a debate held in DC between Lehrer and Bob Inglis on one side and James Taylor (Heartland) and David Kreutzer,(Heritage) about how to deal with climate change. As promised, more about that later. Lehrer said that it was not possible to tease any meaningful trend out of his database for hurricanes.
Ethon has been thinking about this for a while, and it finally occurred to him that there was one unfortunate place in hurricane alley that might provide enough data, Hispanola, a large island in the Caribbean with two countries, the Dominican Republic and Haiti (bunnies might also toss in Cuba on one side and Puerto Rico on the other). The NOAA historical hurricane track site can be used to see where hurricanes and tropical storms have passed
Eli is but a poor bunny, and all he could do is troll the Wikipedia for the number of storm deaths.
Storm
|
Year
|
Hati
|
DR
|
Hazel
|
1954
|
400
|
0
|
Kati
|
1955
|
7
|
0
|
Ella
|
1958
|
30
|
0
|
Flora
|
1963
|
5000
|
400
|
Cleo
|
1964
|
192
|
7
|
Inez
|
1966
|
750
|
100
|
Beulah
|
1967
|
2
|
|
David
|
1979
|
0
|
2000
|
Allen
|
1980
|
220
|
7
|
Emily
|
1987
|
5
|
3
|
Gilbert
|
1988
|
30
|
5
|
Gordon
|
1994
|
1122
|
5
|
Hortense
|
1996
|
39
|
|
Georges
|
1998
|
209
|
380
|
Lili
|
2002
|
4
|
0
|
Odette
|
2003
|
8
|
|
Jeanne
|
2004
|
3006
|
18
|
Alpha
|
2005
|
17
|
9
|
Wilma
|
2005
|
12
|
0
|
Ernesto
|
2006
|
5
|
0
|
Noel
|
2007
|
73
|
87
|
Olga
|
2007
|
2
|
37
|
Dean
|
2007
|
9
|
6
|
Gustav
|
2008
|
77
|
8
|
Hanna
|
2008
|
529
|
1
|
Ike
|
2008
|
74
|
2
|
Thomas
|
2010
|
21
|
0
|
Sandy
|
2012
|
52
|
2
|
Isaac
|
2012
|
24
|
5
|
Irene
|
2011
|
6
|
9
|
1950-2011
|
11876
|
3140
|
|
2011-2000
|
3911
|
192
|
|
2005-1995
|
4358
|
459
|
|
2000-1990
|
1331
|
424
|
If the Rabett looks at the number of killer storms per decade
1950-59 | 3 |
1960-69 | 4 |
1970-79 | 1 |
1980-89 | 3 |
1990-99 | 3 |
2000-09 | 12 |
2010-12 | 3 |
Suggestive that something is going on in hurricane alley.
What this needs, of course, is a serious study with more information about $ damages, numbers of houses destroyed, evacuations and storm tracks. Including eastern Cuba and Puerto Rico would help as can be seen from the graph showing GDPs below.
To be honest, and Eli is always honest, all this is suggestive that more work might be worthwhile.
Volunteers?
I'll put my hand up first.
ReplyDeleteIt suggests (from my own crude analysis, grouping in 5-year buckets, except for 1954-1960 & 2010-2012):
- Deadly storms per year has increased from ~0.4/ yr up to 1990 to ~0.9/yr from then to now.
- Deaths per storm has remained approximately constant, though lower in the Dominican Republic.
The 2nd may be related to GDP, it is hard to see how the first can be.
Toby
There's some Category 5 censorship action over at Watt's , as he breaks wind in the general direction of critical comments, appended to his latest Two Minute Hate .
ReplyDeletehere's Willard's latest takedown.
Russell says:
June 30, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Among my college classmates was a French fellow whose father was still trying to live down a well-intentioned effot to improve his farming tenants and deer herd’s quality of life by reducing the surplus rabbit population.
To that end he imported some myxomatosis infected rabbits from Australia , and sure enough, by year’s end the neighborhood was bunny- free.
As, alas, was every rabbit hutch from Finnisterre to the pas du Calais a year later. It took a decade for the virus to burn itself out of hosts, and the rabbitry of France to recover.
Willard Tony does humor about as well as he does science tho. Excellent thing elst thee and Eli would be out of business.
ReplyDeleteOh, I don't know, W.Tony's efforts are at least as funny as Josh!
ReplyDeleteAnd at most. Talk about leaden...
Slightly interesting is that 1 in 3 "killer" storms occur with the letters G, H and I, over the period 1954 to 2012, rising to around 1 in 2.5 if you arbitrarily split the data set into two at the midpoint in terms of year (i.e. 1983).
ReplyDeletePossibly of more interest is that whereas in the first arbitrary period there are no killer storms past K (the nominal midpoint in storm naming, unless you get more than 21 named storms in a season, such as 2005's Alpha), there are 8 killer storms with names past K in the second period.
Of course, there are obvious caveats to be borne in mind with this rather preliminary analysis, not least with using the storms' initials as a possible proxy for storm timing, so I wouldn't necessarily draw any conclusions from these observations. I just thought they were prima facie interesting.
Cymraeg llygoden
Cymraeg llygoden,
ReplyDeleteAnd your bonus assignment is to tell us why that is a consequence of the seasons + the Poisson distribution.