Rabett Run's correspondent in Stockholm,
Magnus Westerstrand, reports on Robert J. Lefkowitz's Nobel Banquet Speech:
"But of course the annual award of the Nobel Prizes has significance
that reaches far beyond the individual experiences of the Laureates. For
those of us in the sciences, we watch with delight as every October the
eyes of the entire world focus, if only transiently, on the power of
discoveries in chemistry, physics, medicine, physiology, and economics
to shape our lives. However, as an American Scientist, and now Nobel
Laureate, I have never been more aware or more appreciative of this
effect of the Prize announcements.
We have just had a Presidential
election in the United States. One of the fault lines in the campaign
was the role that science plays in shaping public policy decisions. A
clear anti-science bias was apparent in many who sought the presidential
nomination of one of our major political parties. This was manifest as a
refusal to accept for example, the theory of evolution, the existence
of global warming, much less of the role of humans in this process, the
value of vaccines or of embryonic stem cell research. Each of us
Laureates aspires in our own small way to do what we can to counter
these pernicious anti-scientific trends."
Of course, everyone trying to do science in the US is sweating out the last part of that.
All local strains of Stockholm fever pale in comparison to cases caught on the spot.
ReplyDelete