In which art imitates life at Rabett Run
Dear Anonymous,
UPDATE: The spambots got clever so the verification is back. Apologies
Some of the regulars here are having trouble telling the anonymice apart. Please add some distinguishing name to your comment such as Mickey, Minnie, Mighty, or Fred.
You can stretch the comment box for more space
The management.
In other news, Anthony Watts is being classy as ever.
ReplyDeleteLet us preserve the memory of fallen soldiers. Let us not cheapen that spirit by weirdly connecting it with cheap personal taunts.
The bird is dead, long ears rule...
ReplyDeleteby-by
Oh now, the bird was quality trolling. Infuriatingly smug (his intellect unencumbered by any relevant knowledge), linker to some of the crappiest pseudo-science out there (the Moon pdf, which a bunny likened to a 4th grade class in the Bronze Age), poster of items that actually argue against his point but that he misunderstands, and even a religious crackpot! He is a Roc of birdy trolls, a +3HD Abyssal Dire Troll. His presence on this blog distinguishes it from any other climate science blog I've read, and possibly any other blog at all (though there are some contenders at Orac's place).
ReplyDeleteBtw, Pearls Before Swine rocks.
@Carrot eater
ReplyDeleteHe only asked a question. The over-hyped reaction says a lot.
Tim Lambert is still deleting comments over at his blog that prove a major piece of his latest post as wrong. Gee I wonder how often that happens. In his Monckton Wrong" post he claims Monckton "lied" when he quoted box 10.2 of IPCC report. Well go to the link in Tim's article and you will find that Mockton was accurate and Tim is wrong!
"The mean ±1 standard deviation values from these models were 3.8°C ± 0.78°C in the SAR (17 models), 3.5°C ± 0.92°C in the TAR (15 models) and in this assessment 3.26°C ± 0.69°C (18 models)."
Note the words "in this assessment"..
Lambert is a CSP and has been for years.
Jon P (aka Celry Eater)
Snow Bunny says:
ReplyDeleteEli, see the hilarious gobbledegook coming from the deniers this week:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Moon+Stefan+Boltzmann&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
in which they do in the Stefan-Boltzmann law so global warming isn't real!
(For those who don't know Stefan's law relates temperature and energy and has been around for 200 years.)
Jon P,
ReplyDeleteYou somehow missed this part in Tim's post:
"Monckton's numbers do come from box 10.2, but are the mean and standard deviation of the sensitivity for 18 different climate models, which is not the same thing at all."
Monckton is comparing carrots and celery.
A field rabbit has moved into my neighborhood.
ReplyDeleteI named it Eli.
We are honored
ReplyDelete"What are you doing pig?"
ReplyDelete:)