tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post8389077036737731375..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Soon to Be AuditedEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger36125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-61940397818133150082011-08-26T14:48:38.462-04:002011-08-26T14:48:38.462-04:00ligne, you forgot that Al Gore is FAT!ligne, you forgot that Al Gore is FAT!Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-82436669078739611462011-08-26T13:03:12.190-04:002011-08-26T13:03:12.190-04:00Rattus: as Major Jay Cadbury, PLC and Bar (Retd.)...Rattus: as Major Jay Cadbury, PLC and Bar (Retd.) quite reasonably deduced, if ATI fail to mine any juicy quotes, it's because all the evidence is being hushed up by Big Research.<br /><br />after all, Mann is quite clearly guilty of *something*. it's just that no-one quite knows what it is yet. owning a goatee and a big slice of tree?lignenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-39000494149595184172011-08-25T21:05:42.063-04:002011-08-25T21:05:42.063-04:00Two full business days and not a peep from the ATI...Two full business days and not a peep from the ATI, even though they promised to make a press release yesterday laying out what they had found. You don't suppose it could be because there is nothing there, could it?Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-48810250348997013632011-08-25T10:44:25.322-04:002011-08-25T10:44:25.322-04:00Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
@Lionel
Yeah that's ab...Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.<br /><br />@Lionel<br /><br />Yeah that's about what I thought, you have nothing to say because your embarassed. <br /><br />@Eli<br /><br />The good doctor cannot wait to see all the dubious lies and falsifications in the Mann emails. Of course, the real good ones will be blocked, using some bogus excuse. <br /><br />I would consider this an invasion of privacy but since it's clear the realclimate team believes they should run the science community in a totalitarian fashion, I say they had it and have more coming.<br /><br />Eli, would you mind storing your tears in a graduated cylinder for the good doctor to sample when Rick Perry steam rolls Obumba?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-29140335787010232392011-08-24T16:50:10.763-04:002011-08-24T16:50:10.763-04:00ATI has two sets of documents, those which are not...ATI has two sets of documents, those which are not claimed to be exempt from FOIA and those that are. IIRC, they are free to say whatever they want about those which are not claimed to be exempt from FOIA, they are only gagged on those which are claimed to be exempt.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-7245668634175897432011-08-24T16:25:50.440-04:002011-08-24T16:25:50.440-04:00thanks to caerbannog's comment this was posted...thanks to caerbannog's comment this was posted: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/federal-inquiry-is-latest-to-clear-assailed-climate-scientist/?permid=20#comment20<br /><br />which I think resulted in this: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/wheres-fox-followup-on-climate-inquiry/<br /><br />and just maybe that forced this (no timestamp hard to tell):<br />http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/08/24/national-science-foundation-clears-climate-change-researcher/bnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-86642080994547537332011-08-24T16:11:01.386-04:002011-08-24T16:11:01.386-04:00ATI has the disc, but they also have huge problems...ATI has the disc, but they also have huge problems if they say anything about the emails before the court agrees. One of the things to watch is if any hints show up on the blogs that ATI has blown the confidentiality agreement. Eli would be happy to make problems for them.Eli Rabetthttp://rabett.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-41003871943608279722011-08-24T16:04:41.757-04:002011-08-24T16:04:41.757-04:00No doubt they are busy trying to figure out how to...<i><br />No doubt they are busy trying to figure out how to spin it. My bet is they switch to the ATI email release in their ever lasting quest to maintain the semelence of a permanent invesigation. </i><br /><br />Bingo! <br /><br />From the number 1 science blog in the world: <br /><br />"Via email I’m getting reports that the American Tradition Institute has a CD ROM of the Mann University of Virginia emails in hand and are evaluating them.<br /><br />They are in a 4.3 Megabyte file consisting of 3,827 pages.<br /><br />Given the suspicious timing of the recent Mann “vindication” report (PDF) from an investigation by the National Science Foundation, I think the effort will be likely to be focused on “what wasn’t released”"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-22251251586256081482011-08-24T14:10:41.964-04:002011-08-24T14:10:41.964-04:00HO HO HO
'Side note: I'd like an explanat...HO HO HO<br /><br />'Side note: I'd like an explanation of the recent article from James Hansen about coal being the worst fossil fuel. I didn't catch any posts here about the recent study claiming Chinese coal emissions blocked warming. What is everyone's take on these contradicting stories?'<br /><br />No contradictions unless you wish to talk about apples whilst we are considering oranges and think of the short term effects whilst Hansen is considering the long term.<br /><br />If that still puzzles you need to do more home-work.<br /><br />You do seem to have lost some of your Smarties.Lionel Ahttp://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-23439107094180022722011-08-24T12:16:43.570-04:002011-08-24T12:16:43.570-04:00Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
"For the logicly chall...Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.<br /><br />"For the logicly challenged, this means Mann's reconstructions ( and everyboby else's) are completely in agreement with Lamb."<br /><br />Okay well I see everyone is just going to attack me for calling out Michael Mann. <br /><br />@John McManus<br /><br />I totally agree, John, and that's exactly why Lamb's graph is completely different than Mann's. Mann ate the Lamb, McManus.<br /><br />Side note: I'd like an explanation of the recent article from James Hansen about coal being the worst fossil fuel. I didn't catch any posts here about the recent study claiming Chinese coal emissions blocked warming. What is everyone's take on these contradicting stories?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-87437740812105207292011-08-24T09:35:45.249-04:002011-08-24T09:35:45.249-04:00There is a majic wordThere is a majic wordEliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-828498612073477912011-08-24T07:16:28.372-04:002011-08-24T07:16:28.372-04:00HO HO HO
'I’m going to turn on every single l...HO HO HO<br /><br />'I’m going to turn on every single light, every single appliance and anything else in my house that burns fossil fuels.'<br /><br />Don't be silly your chocolate will melt. What a Charlie. He was driven by ideology too was he not.Lionel Ahttp://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-32832903993980281162011-08-24T04:37:52.393-04:002011-08-24T04:37:52.393-04:00Hey, what did you expect from someone not even und...Hey, what did you expect from someone not even understanding how a greenhouse works ? An urban specie for sure, this "phd" Cadburydium :] <br /><br />Points go for Dhogaza, of course, he was the first to shoot. Must be because he went to far into wattasshatery and begins to be tainted, although he tries to stay sane by visiting lots of clean sites :] <br /><br />BratislaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-18853484579105331942011-08-23T19:24:10.792-04:002011-08-23T19:24:10.792-04:00Cadbury ought to study Ray Pierrehumbert's &qu...Cadbury ought to study Ray Pierrehumbert's "Principles of Planetary Climate"<br />http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/PrinciplesPlanetaryClimate/index.html<br />but maybe it is beyond him...David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-30948834627493090502011-08-23T17:30:05.058-04:002011-08-23T17:30:05.058-04:0024 hours new and the only peep is from "The B...24 hours new and the only peep is from "The Bishop" and his fan bois.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-25576263226581936472011-08-23T17:07:58.145-04:002011-08-23T17:07:58.145-04:00I notice skeptic blogs haven't covered this st...I notice skeptic blogs haven't covered this story, unless I missed it.<br /><br />No doubt they are busy trying to figure out how to spin it. My bet is they switch to the ATI email release in their ever lasting quest to maintain the semelence of a permanent invesigation.bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71540724021452545772011-08-23T16:19:55.220-04:002011-08-23T16:19:55.220-04:00Mr. Cadbury lays another egg. And it ain't ch...Mr. Cadbury lays another egg. And it ain't chocolate, that's for sure.Robert Murphynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-31953239704190088202011-08-23T15:44:44.694-04:002011-08-23T15:44:44.694-04:00Not to feed the troll, but some bunnies might have...Not to feed the troll, but some bunnies might have missed this post:<br /><br />http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/02/15/psu-cover-up-extremely-unlikely/<br /><br />Short version: Mann's funding was about .06% of Penn's total over 2006-2009. Maybe universities are so inept that they would risk 99.14% of their funding to protect a single researcher?<br /><br />-blueshiftAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-25976030326062452252011-08-23T15:38:23.120-04:002011-08-23T15:38:23.120-04:00Dear Dr. Cadbury-Nutbar:
As you know Lamb's s...Dear Dr. Cadbury-Nutbar:<br /><br />As you know Lamb's sketch isn't about temperatures or hemisperes or world.<br /><br />Lamb was quite careful to say that he didn't think higher temperatures C 1000(or whenever the denier halucinates) extended past the North Atlantic coastlines. <br /><br />For the logicly challenged, this means Mann's reconstructions ( and everyboby else's) are completely in agreement with Lamb.<br /><br />Dr. Jay : It's hard for me to see Lamb's mid 1960"s theories as historic. The time of the Stones, Spencer Davis and the Beatles is current to me.John McManusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-76305333069349552722011-08-23T15:10:00.849-04:002011-08-23T15:10:00.849-04:00Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
@Dhogaza
Pffft, the *NSF* ...Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.<br /><br />@Dhogaza<br /><br />Pffft, the *NSF* IG? Everyone knows that the National [commie pinko] Science Foundation will protect its own!<br /><br />(there, did I beat Watts or McI or Bishop Hill or Tom Fuller or Steven Mosher to the punch?) <br /><br />Yeah everyone does know that they're going to protect their own research money. Just like Penn State. Dhogaza, get back to me when you quit playing pretend.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-37826653178863136802011-08-23T15:08:07.596-04:002011-08-23T15:08:07.596-04:00Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
HO HO HO. So let me get thi...Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.<br /><br />HO HO HO. So let me get this straight, Eli. When I looked at H.H Lamb's temperature reconstruction and note that Michael Mann's is completely different, that is spin to you, huh? Since Mann was exonerated of any wrongdoing even though it is very clear he cheated, what's next, Eli? How about he goes back and totally changes the temperature data during the age of the dinosaurs. After all, Mann the man has carte blanche to revise history all he wants. Your defense is shameful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-40193470475396181592011-08-23T15:01:05.174-04:002011-08-23T15:01:05.174-04:00GMU: 17 months since Bradley's original, it is...<i><br />GMU: 17 months since Bradley's original, it is still under review. Apparently Nature's exhortation to alacrity has yet to take effect<br /></i><br /><br />Didn't it take less time than that to exonerate Mann 7(?) times???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-17084545053145401512011-08-23T12:26:22.972-04:002011-08-23T12:26:22.972-04:00The bill is paid for by everyone driving a car, vi...The bill is paid for by everyone driving a car, via gas prices of course. Or everyone using any electrical appliance. Too trivial a fact to hold under anyone's nose obviously...cRR Kampenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07571285063752477448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-6077828502962545992011-08-23T12:22:46.927-04:002011-08-23T12:22:46.927-04:00And when will the bill for the costs incurred wast...And when will the bill for the costs incurred wasting everybody's time land on Cuccinelli & Co.'s. mat?Lionel Ahttp://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-24790081338932686322011-08-23T10:23:13.121-04:002011-08-23T10:23:13.121-04:00GMU: 17 months since Bradley's original, it is...GMU: 17 months since Bradley's original, it is still under review. Apparently Nature's exhortation to alacrity has yet to take effect.John Masheynoreply@blogger.com