tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post6813483157365955303..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Taking it to a new levelEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-38497534279891926542010-12-24T14:19:43.583-05:002010-12-24T14:19:43.583-05:00Dear Mr. Rabett,
I was directed here through the O...Dear Mr. Rabett,<br />I was directed here through the Open Mind. I've read the first Manabe paper and I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable can help me understand something. Page 795 - the figure seems to indicate we can expect the Antarctic ice to increase (in thickness at least, although that implies extent increase to me to) for 100 years! Where am I going wrong!? <br />AnonyfredAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-85322570026237474292010-09-04T17:58:01.151-04:002010-09-04T17:58:01.151-04:00"Who can you trust to tell you what to think&..."Who can you trust to tell you what to think"?<br /><br />In the midst of such times of uncertainty and turbulence, <a href="http://denialdepot.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Dr Inferno</a>, and <a href="http://theclimatescum.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Baron von Monckhofen</a> may always b e counted upon to uphold the flaming torch of science and truth.chekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09076463055055404580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-36186478036581797522010-09-04T17:33:03.580-04:002010-09-04T17:33:03.580-04:00My head is spinning. The idiocies of Watts, Godda...My head is spinning. The idiocies of Watts, Goddard, Curry, et al. pile up one upon another so fast that my powers of derision are overwhelmed. How must it be for faithful at WUWT? Do they even perceive the avalanche of stupid thundering down upon them?<br /><br />Put yourself in the place of a tenor in the WUWT choir. You've been cheering Goddard's series of posts claiming that the whole "Arctic sea ice is melting" thing is BS, but now you've been confronted with irrefutable evidence that your hero is an ninny. Even a witless denier like you must acknowledge the truth of this when your guru Watts is forced to slap Goddard down.<br /><br />But now, loyal denier that you are, you must confront the larger, more disturbing notion that your guru himself, Watts, is suspect. After all, he featured this twit in his blog multiple times. Where is your touchstone now? Where is your connection to reality? Who can you trust to tell you what to think?Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13955691670049830140noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-74361931772210910932010-09-04T15:16:19.452-04:002010-09-04T15:16:19.452-04:00Rattus Norvegicus, thanks for the extra info. I fo...Rattus Norvegicus, thanks for the extra info. I found the AR4 and TAR info within ten minutes but left it there. The plagiarism "talking point" will no doubt be doing the rounds this week from the plastic sceptics.J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-34312573177656273932010-09-04T11:42:01.299-04:002010-09-04T11:42:01.299-04:00J Bowers, this actually goes back to the SAR.
And...J Bowers, this actually goes back to the SAR.<br /><br />And what Tony, and LaFramboise, miss is the fact the he cited the underlying research. And oh yeah, the increase in asthma and other respiratory diseases due to sandstorms was first noted during the 1930's. That little incident called the "dustbowl".Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-8930148800098770742010-09-04T08:28:24.828-04:002010-09-04T08:28:24.828-04:00Hmmm, the book is by AJ McMichael (Anthony McMicha...Hmmm, the book is by AJ McMichael (Anthony McMichael)<br /><br />Hmmm, an IPCC AR4 WG2 review editor is called Anthony McMichael. And then there's the TAR WG2, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Based on a draft prepared by: ..... Anthony McMichael....<br />http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/vol4/english/108.htm<br /><br />Did the IPCC also plagiarise his name as well? Crikey.J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-69019273164306601952010-09-04T08:16:07.303-04:002010-09-04T08:16:07.303-04:00I think perhaps people are assigning the title to ...<em>I think perhaps people are assigning the title to me, and just to be clear, that was Donna’s title which is why I have it in quotes. See the link “Donna writes…” I’m going to make that a little clearer. – Anthony</em><br /><br />Translation: I'm not responsible for the charges of plagiarism. I'm just a conduit for charges of plagiarism. And please take no note of my words of praise for the author of charges of plagiarism. Or the fact that it was my choice to post the charges of plagiarism on my blog.<br /><br />What a weasel.Ron Broberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00360356366869878444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-7737109461453758172010-09-04T03:31:18.991-04:002010-09-04T03:31:18.991-04:00Well, as long as we are dealing with the failings ...Well, as long as we are dealing with the failings of WUWT, here is another example of, well I really don't know, but it is pretty stupid. <br /><br />http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/03/and-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming-the-book-the-ipcc-plagiarized/#more-24399Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-38226197288945441602010-09-04T00:58:50.553-04:002010-09-04T00:58:50.553-04:00Best statement by Steven Goddard ever: "we sc...Best statement by Steven Goddard ever: "we scientists".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-32231136832991182612010-09-03T17:03:11.093-04:002010-09-03T17:03:11.093-04:00Even more gone emeritus.Even more gone emeritus.David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-52168695634841639252010-09-03T16:56:48.243-04:002010-09-03T16:56:48.243-04:00I'd love to, Eli, alas I can't.I'd love to, Eli, alas I can't.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-52239187871895392922010-09-03T16:07:54.367-04:002010-09-03T16:07:54.367-04:00Please, please bluegrue, tell Eli you are kidding....Please, please bluegrue, tell Eli you are kidding. Pretty please.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-42670276908489388372010-09-03T14:44:01.069-04:002010-09-03T14:44:01.069-04:00It does indeed seem that J.C. has gone emeritus, a...It does indeed seem that J.C. has gone emeritus, as the saying is.David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-90729283010871688142010-09-03T14:19:13.266-04:002010-09-03T14:19:13.266-04:00We are talking about two entirely different errors...We are talking about <i>two</i> entirely different errors by Goddard. The one error Goddard conceded at tamino is that he compared a 1999 land only temperature graph and a current land and ocean temperature graph, insinuating insidious changes done to the record by Hansen/NASA. <br /><br />The error JMurphy pointed out is that Goddard does not understand the triple point of water.<br /><br /><i>If you look at 2006, extent dropped rapidly right before it flatlined. This year may be a repeat of that pattern. Given the triple point of water at 0C, the behaviour of the ice can change dramatically with a very small change in the weather.</i><br />and in reply to the question <i>Do you know what the triple point of water is? It is not 0C, but you are fairly close, but what pressure?</i> Goddard replied:<br /><i>The ocean is at 1 bar atmospheric pressure. That is how it is defined.<br /><br />We did learn a little about phase diagrams in my graduate school geochemistry program.</i><br /><br />The rest of the reply was snipped, it went downhill from there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-59081933270065393462010-09-03T11:32:01.851-04:002010-09-03T11:32:01.851-04:00Goddard could have just RTFC on the figure. Hell ...Goddard could have just RTFC on the figure. Hell he even linked to the page with the caption trying to tell me I was wrong, telling me to "look at it in context".Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-17814381556307637712010-09-03T11:26:14.303-04:002010-09-03T11:26:14.303-04:00That's the best steven goddard thread yet.
Do...That's the best steven goddard thread yet.<br /><br />Do you if enough of us ask nicely that Anthony will take him back? Entertainment of such quality is so hard to come by!dhogazanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-41105216414776204842010-09-03T10:47:33.511-04:002010-09-03T10:47:33.511-04:00Credibility is like arctic sea ice: once it's ...Credibility is like arctic sea ice: once it's gone, it's very hard to get it back.Horatio Algeranonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12988805467080448954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-17669701385718999852010-09-03T10:33:46.040-04:002010-09-03T10:33:46.040-04:00Climate Progress is back up
Litte MouseClimate Progress is back up<br /><br />Litte MouseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-37515950554111210782010-09-03T10:23:13.926-04:002010-09-03T10:23:13.926-04:00Goddard responds over at tamino saying it was his ...Goddard responds over at tamino saying it was his mistake <br /><br />stevengoddard | September 2, 2010 at 3:20 am | Reply<br /><br />Phil.<br /><br />As I am sure you are aware, Anthony shut down comments – so it would be pretty difficult for me to respond.<br /><br />However, it does appear that the 1999 “global graph” probably excluded the 70% of the globe which comprises the oceans, so the basis of my article was most likely incorrect.<br /><br /><br />Interesting how he didnt say this in front of his followers...Robertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-21331108525117443302010-09-03T08:06:43.434-04:002010-09-03T08:06:43.434-04:00I had the same problem with Climate Progress (gett...I had the same problem with Climate Progress (getting blank pages) so I tried a few other sites and then tried CP again, and it is now accessible again. Strange.<br /><br />Now, while I'm here, I wondered whether anyone noticed Steve Goddard's final embarrassment over at WUWT - even Watt's got fed up. <br /><br /><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/29/sea-ice-news-20/#comment-472620" rel="nofollow">Steven you really need to stop</a><br /><br /><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/29/sea-ice-news-20/#comment-472709" rel="nofollow">And since you won't take the hints, I'm closing the thread with this image</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/29/sea-ice-news-20/#comment-472379" rel="nofollow">Read Goddard from here onwards</a><br /><br /><br />(Hope the 'nofollow' bit works in those links, so Watts doesn't get any extra traffic)JMurphynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-81085022994522628662010-09-03T07:07:47.705-04:002010-09-03T07:07:47.705-04:00thinkprogress, which is hosted at the same IP, is ...thinkprogress, which is hosted at the same IP, is down, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-52383531349294181032010-09-03T06:57:56.762-04:002010-09-03T06:57:56.762-04:00Blank page here too in the UK at 11:50 BST on both...Blank page here too in the UK at 11:50 BST on both Explorer and Firefox.Lionel Ahttp://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-32786409209303013192010-09-03T04:58:52.522-04:002010-09-03T04:58:52.522-04:00Yep, got a blank page too. So it's not only in...Yep, got a blank page too. So it's not only in the US.jyyhhttp://denialdepot.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-31890070996702839232010-09-03T04:04:17.764-04:002010-09-03T04:04:17.764-04:00On Joe Romm's Climate Progress website :-
Me ...On Joe Romm's Climate Progress website :-<br /><br />Me too.<br /><br />Blank page.<br /><br />Hope it's nothing serious.joabbesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15283778618946337028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-80664099870162196222010-09-03T00:06:58.519-04:002010-09-03T00:06:58.519-04:00Me too Tim...I just tried (using SAFARI), no joy.
...Me too Tim...I just tried (using SAFARI), no joy.<br /><br />There is also the possibility that it was hacked....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com