tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post667323983121203221..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: EliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-47345741802181502082008-10-02T07:10:00.000-04:002008-10-02T07:10:00.000-04:00Deja Vu: A Study of Duplicate Citations in Medline...<A HREF="http://www.citeulike.org/user/dullhunk/article/2230076" REL="nofollow">Deja Vu: A Study of Duplicate Citations in Medline</A>Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10768655514143252049noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-38656315233118382562008-08-17T03:15:00.000-04:002008-08-17T03:15:00.000-04:00"Is this a new kind of "Shouting Down"?"No, its so..."Is this a new kind of "Shouting Down"?"<BR/><BR/>No, its someone who probably contributes to half a dozen different blogs on a bunch of different subjects, and relieves his feelings by stamping his feet and screaming on all of them. In the end, any widely read open blog on any subject attracts a horde of these nutters. Or maybe it is actually one nutter under different names? And they then have a choice: either they implement moderating, or their comments section becomes unreadable. Its not just pro-AGW blogs that hit this bump, Watts hit it too. Forums on almost anything, diet to finance hit it as well. Moderation is the only answer.<BR/><BR/>Eli seems not to care however.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-54093992227071432242008-08-07T14:19:00.000-04:002008-08-07T14:19:00.000-04:00The proper technical term is very likely "making f...The proper technical term is very likely "making fun of silly people" instead of "shouting down". Neither is very polite, but the former is amusing to watch.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-45688534687539512132008-08-07T09:29:00.000-04:002008-08-07T09:29:00.000-04:00Is this a new kind of "Shouting Down"?Is this a new kind of "Shouting Down"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-66304982510944130322008-08-06T04:19:00.000-04:002008-08-06T04:19:00.000-04:00The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are...The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... Om... Om... Om... Om... Om... Om...bi -- International Journal of Inactivismhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03030282249404084578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-58291074875051378292008-08-05T18:42:00.000-04:002008-08-05T18:42:00.000-04:00So everyone's hyping their conclusions that are op...So everyone's hyping their conclusions that are opinion as facts. What else is new?<BR/><BR/>Joe P.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-55525783113022257912008-08-05T04:52:00.000-04:002008-08-05T04:52:00.000-04:00The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are...The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... The Alarmists Are Just As Bad... Om... Om... Om...<BR/><BR/>Always the same old mantra.bi -- International Journal of Inactivismhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03030282249404084578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-52534489287823041062008-08-05T02:53:00.000-04:002008-08-05T02:53:00.000-04:00I think the Hockey Team have the record, with thei...I think the Hockey Team have the record, with their mutiple fake rehashing of alleged temperature proxies, all using permutations of the same data, and all equally wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-61550772265789168762008-08-04T15:51:00.000-04:002008-08-04T15:51:00.000-04:00Maybe they figured the chance of getting the paper...Maybe they figured the chance of getting the paper accepted was so low they decided to submit it to several journals at the same time? Given the quality, there may be a dozen other journals that rejected it. If it was only submitted to two journals and both accepted it, that would be scary, showing the review system to be totally broken.<BR/><BR/>The minor differences between the papers may be due to comments by reviewers forcing some editing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com