tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post5857537785698019203..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Ms. Rabett's Nude Scientist Exam....EliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-73086894651292157552006-12-30T18:58:00.000-05:002006-12-30T18:58:00.000-05:00"Steve [Hemphill] is not a scientist."
Neither is..."Steve [Hemphill] is not a scientist."<br /><br />Neither is Roger Pielke, Jr -- unless you count "political science" (an oxymoron, if ever there was one).<br /><br />But that does not seem to have gotten in his way, either.<br /><br />What's sci-ence got ta-do, <br />got ta-do-with-it?<br />What's science, but the study of stuff in motion?<br /><br />What's sci-ence got ta-do, <br />got ta-do-with-it?<br />Who needs a scientist, when a<br />wonk's already spoken?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com