tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post3122321403284987306..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: I'd seriously like to make a Wall Street Journal Daily LaughAlong AppEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-7874465720948081062012-08-28T22:36:36.526-04:002012-08-28T22:36:36.526-04:00Allow Eli to call bullshit on that. The WSJ has b...Allow Eli to call bullshit on that. The WSJ has been using that crap for years to cover up their obdurate stupidity. They work for the same boss. They do his bidding.<br /><br />Anyone who allows a WSJ reporter to run that game on them deserves what they get.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-49277511249791265592012-08-28T18:25:09.069-04:002012-08-28T18:25:09.069-04:00Thanx Hank.Thanx Hank.THE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71713546136739624022012-08-28T18:15:47.270-04:002012-08-28T18:15:47.270-04:00Distinguish the WSJ Editorial Board from the WSJ j...Distinguish the WSJ Editorial Board from the WSJ journalists. These are discrete non-overlapping sets:<br /><br />https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awsj.com+"acid+rain"Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-11355909124216128512012-08-28T09:10:07.340-04:002012-08-28T09:10:07.340-04:00Thanks for the link to the article debunking WSJ. ...Thanks for the link to the article debunking WSJ. I knew that they have been anti-science in recent years, but this show that they have been consistently wrong for a very long time, well before the Murdoch era.<br /><br />BillD<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-6402310520385174872012-08-28T09:08:12.658-04:002012-08-28T09:08:12.658-04:00Thanks for the link to the article debunking WSJ. ...Thanks for the link to the article debunking WSJ. I knew that they have been anti-science in recent years, but this show that they have been consistently wrong for a very long time, well before the Murdoch era.<br /><br />BillDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-37736230719557276532012-08-27T19:59:38.023-04:002012-08-27T19:59:38.023-04:00I do not!I do not!Rascal Dognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-61788015951203676582012-08-27T19:00:43.741-04:002012-08-27T19:00:43.741-04:00On the internet, nobody can tell that your dog wea...On the internet, nobody can tell that your dog wears dentures.THE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-22960829022168113502012-08-27T17:36:25.765-04:002012-08-27T17:36:25.765-04:00Maybe because in Europe and the US folks did somet...Maybe because in Europe and the US folks did something about it?<br /><br />Remember in Snoopytooth land solving problems mean they never existedEliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-1573143474660682972012-08-27T14:10:21.936-04:002012-08-27T14:10:21.936-04:00Applying his dernierguage to the filaments of sock...Applying his dernierguage to the filaments of sockpuppetry the noted stadometer Dr. Cadelot Chocula D.Perp. has detected a 2 sigma roll off in Jay Cadbury postings attending the rise of the genus<i> lumpus</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-30111491759934625802012-08-27T12:18:55.473-04:002012-08-27T12:18:55.473-04:00Dr. Lumpus Spookytooth, phd.
I noted the timeline...Dr. Lumpus Spookytooth, phd.<br /><br />I noted the timeline for acid rain only extends until 1990...<br /><br />that's because acid rain never materialized into the trumped up problem it was supposed to be. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com