tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post1966428013390020224..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: The Past is PrologueEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-67075440286686338152013-05-18T22:37:31.185-04:002013-05-18T22:37:31.185-04:00In thinking about it, Eli thought that the five ca...In thinking about it, Eli thought that the five categories<br /><br />Discussion<br />Methods<br />Paleoclimate<br />Unrelated<br />Undecided<br /><br />were all in the middle between reject and acceptEliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-87894618888277946892013-05-18T11:49:09.069-04:002013-05-18T11:49:09.069-04:00Are you an alarmist?
Are you a wacked out sceptic...Are you an alarmist?<br /><br />Are you a wacked out sceptic?<br /><br />If you answer no to these two questions, chances are you are lukewarm.<br /><br />Why, you may ask? <br /><br />Because the Pope of the Lukewarm church proclaimed so:<br /><br />> If I choose to divide the world into 3 classes: wacked out alarmists. Wacked out skeptics; and the sane middle ground, you dont get to challenge my classification. You simply dont get to challenge it. And in the end you will see that 97% of people are<br />in the middle, as I define it.<br /><br />http://rankexploits.com/musings/2013/on-the-consensus/#comment-113304<br /><br />In his infinite wisdom, the Pope of the Lukewarm Church made it clear that <b>you don't get to challenge that</b>.<br /><br />Welcome aboard!willardhttp://neverendingaudit.tumblr.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-26744867082117397072013-05-18T02:56:30.218-04:002013-05-18T02:56:30.218-04:00I always wondered what happened, but since the eff...I always wondered what happened, but since the effort seemed to peter out right along with my time for it I never really inquired...cobyhttp://scienceblogs.com/illconsiderednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-6999525076760068452013-05-17T09:51:13.869-04:002013-05-17T09:51:13.869-04:00Eli, typo alert: "The primary difference is t...Eli, typo alert: "The primary difference is that the Prequel team had FEWER categories in the middle ..."Ted Kirkpatricknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-60270668681855165722013-05-17T09:19:59.469-04:002013-05-17T09:19:59.469-04:00Congratulations to John Cook on getting the attent...Congratulations to John Cook on getting the attention of the big Kahuna (and wish he'd get a spine and stop thinking like a lawyer about science on climate):<br /><br />http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/obama-gives-aussie-researcher-31541507-reasons-to-celebrate-20130517-2jqrh.html<br />(h/t Tenney Naumer)<br /><br />"Obama gives Aussie researcher 31,541,507 reasons to celebrate<br /><br />Peter Hannam, Carbon economy editor, The Sydney Morning Herald, May 17, 2013Susan Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16935228911713362040noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-70879688724038923992013-05-17T00:16:52.862-04:002013-05-17T00:16:52.862-04:00Eli, since completing the Consensus Project, I'...Eli, since completing the Consensus Project, I've learnt of two efforts to measure the consensus in peer-reviewed papers - both cases rating less than 1000 abstracts and both cases failing to complete and publish the project. If I'd been aware of this at the start of our project, I probably wouldn't have opted for a sample size of 12,000+ abstracts!John Cookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13709658149377918808noreply@blogger.com