tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post7579812588043463238..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Established ScienceEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-81779561314661467522014-02-18T01:21:26.253-05:002014-02-18T01:21:26.253-05:00Lindzen and his ilk, working to be "oppositio...Lindzen and his ilk, working to be "oppositional researchers" against the IPCC, are working with conservative media to provide an echochamber of deceit. This is a proven strategy for furthering the agenda of special interests who wish to stall or halt regulatory action against their (deadly) products.<br /><br />While Lindzen is wrong, and becoming more wrong. What we need to be discussing is how the IPCC is self-limiting their discussion and that there is about 50/50 chance that their estimates for climate sensitivity and carbon cycle feedbacks are off by a significant amount, leading to a potential doubling of their warming estimates by 2050.John Mitchellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-84942863294471818072013-09-28T02:51:23.058-04:002013-09-28T02:51:23.058-04:00Tired...BS
Try writing less of it, then.
Taylor ...<i>Tired...BS</i><br /><br />Try writing less of it, then.<br /><br />Taylor BAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-85684001323460514482013-09-28T00:47:09.954-04:002013-09-28T00:47:09.954-04:00Established science is what the IPCC uses when it ...<b>Established science</b> is what the IPCC uses when it says that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten the environment in which we live.<br />I'm pretty sure you mean <i>established <b>political</b> rhetoric</i>… :)Tired of reading BSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-20318749381138928282013-09-26T19:34:35.506-04:002013-09-26T19:34:35.506-04:00"...some us see this sort of thing all too of..."...some us see this sort of thing all too often from people who 100% mean it."<br /><br />That's not a problem; that's a feature of a well written Poe.(Poerody?) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Poe <br /><br />"Poe's law, in broader form, is:<br /><br /> Without a blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of extremism or fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."Brian Dodgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning_Krugernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-36122925488875771092013-09-26T12:32:12.733-04:002013-09-26T12:32:12.733-04:00AnonySpilopsylla:
The problem with your sarcasm i...AnonySpilopsylla:<br /><br />The problem with your sarcasm is that some us see this sort of thing all too often from people who 100% mean it. In studying a recent blog storm, I've seen 100s of similar comments....<br /><br />John Masheynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-70306462399846694452013-09-26T10:21:21.627-04:002013-09-26T10:21:21.627-04:00Sorry I do have a sarcasm problem. I don't sp...Sorry I do have a sarcasm problem. I don't spot it well. My hunting habits go only so far as small furry deniers, like the Monckton (Weaselus liar) and the Watts (Willarus antonius.Catmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-80100275226251659202013-09-26T08:07:01.650-04:002013-09-26T08:07:01.650-04:00Sorry, did I forget to put a smiley at the end of ...Sorry, did I forget to put a smiley at the end of the post?<br /><br />Evidently my sarcasm fell on at least one pair of deaf furry ears.<br /><br />Perhaps catmando should go back to decimating the small mammal population (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21236690)*<br /><br /><br />*more badly targetted humour - hoping people will lighten up once AR5 is out...<br /><br />AnonySpilopsylla Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-36763472473775760552013-09-26T07:47:20.331-04:002013-09-26T07:47:20.331-04:00Eli
I think AnonySpilopsylla's comment proves...Eli<br /><br />I think AnonySpilopsylla's comment proves that the captcha can be cracked by randomly hitting keys. I can't think that the comment given is in any way the product of an intelligent sentient being.<br /><br />CatmandoCatmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-16335035701758135342013-09-26T06:14:26.506-04:002013-09-26T06:14:26.506-04:00Established Science = Establishment Science; Estab...Established Science = Establishment Science; Establishment = Government. Thus Established (Consensus) Science = Conspiracy for One World Government.<br /><br />Bloody Commie Scientists.<br /><br />AnonySpilopsyllaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com