tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post5271241778963321306..comments2024-03-18T03:27:18.777-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: EliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-28914165270207139352006-12-22T08:57:00.000-05:002006-12-22T08:57:00.000-05:00Yes Dano, it appears in the same section as the "D...Yes Dano, it appears in the same section as the "Dano's contributions to science" monogrammed wastepaper basket.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-26961215105733932302006-12-13T23:16:00.000-05:002006-12-13T23:16:00.000-05:00I see, Exxon and the forty elves (Scaife, and co.)...I see, Exxon and the forty elves (Scaife, and co.) have spent those millions subsidizing religious Christmas Parties, where chaste, but sexy modest women fall all over him.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-13879350333060719042006-12-12T16:36:00.000-05:002006-12-12T16:36:00.000-05:00Oh goody. I think the "war on climate science" can...<i>Oh goody. I think the "war on climate science" can be filed next to the "war on Christmas" and the feminist "backlash theory" in the crackpot section of Borders. </i><br /><br />Does that section include the new journal <i>Galileo: The CA Journal of NewScience</i>, produced by Googlers ignorant of the basic knowledge, but propelled by the clear flame of certainty? <br /><br />Fueled by Cheetos and the mistaken idea that statistics can tell you everything except why you have no dates.<br /><br />Best,<br /><br />DDanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03709762632849004871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-88250707132396560692006-12-12T15:21:00.000-05:002006-12-12T15:21:00.000-05:00Oh goody. I think the "war on climate science" can...Oh goody. I think the "war on climate science" can be filed next to the "war on Christmas" and the feminist "backlash theory" in the crackpot section of Borders.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71637190478491073152006-12-12T08:13:00.000-05:002006-12-12T08:13:00.000-05:00I don't see anything profoud here. She is basicall...I don't see anything profoud here. She is basically stating the obvious.<br /><br />If she is waiting for a better-informed public to solve the problem, good luck. I'd bet that hell will freeze over before most members of the public are equipped to make judegments about which scientists and which scientifc groups are most credible.<br /><br />The real problem is not the public, it's that the "dissident scientists" (and others who have no background in science whatsoever) are not playing the science game the way it should be played. In fact, they are subverting the process by doing "science by blog" which ain't real science at all. The only reason these people get away with "publishing" what amounts to crap for their masters (Exxon-Mobil et al) is that they are not publishing in scientific journals, by and large.<br /><br />Blogs may be great for a educating some members of the general public (I am dubious about even that), but they should ceratinly not take the place of the tradtional peer review and publication process, which some bloggers (eg, on Climate Audit) seem to continually belittle (not coincicentally).<br /><br />I think it is time that scientists used their "authority" to enforce the rules among the members of their own group.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com