tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post4946922763844796459..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Return of the Red QueenEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-65449415387591372802015-10-28T08:35:22.041-04:002015-10-28T08:35:22.041-04:00@Hank....Nope not a bot spammer, my wordpress site...@Hank....Nope not a bot spammer, my wordpress site is not solely about AGW, but has a chunk of posts on the subject.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-4589377100742239382015-10-27T11:29:13.577-04:002015-10-27T11:29:13.577-04:00> carcosa
Botspammer strikes.
And speaking of ...> carcosa<br />Botspammer strikes.<br /><br />And speaking of bots and spammers, dang, nobody's perfect:<br /><br />http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/29.05.html#subj5Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-4020460578482770572015-10-27T05:43:44.708-04:002015-10-27T05:43:44.708-04:00Very good article.Very good article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71489269304125656312015-10-26T04:16:36.249-04:002015-10-26T04:16:36.249-04:00For his own credibility, that I dislike seeing sel...For his own credibility, that I dislike seeing self-undermined, I'd suggest Mr Lewandowsky substitute "spherical" for "round" in his otherwise puzzling statement "the Earth cannot both be round and flat."<br /><br />As to internal contradiction, I fail to see how deniers are both unwilling to bet and that their exists valid data to claim "that bets against greenhouse warming are largely hopeless now." <br /><br />John PumaJohnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12479974040070719985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-87213857317044488982015-10-25T19:19:33.660-04:002015-10-25T19:19:33.660-04:00Godwin must have been a brilliant scientist, no?
...Godwin must have been a brilliant scientist, no?<br /><br />That's right up there with general relativity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-77079073107376062252015-10-25T17:40:06.410-04:002015-10-25T17:40:06.410-04:00@angtech
Here is "Global Warming invented by...@angtech<br /><br />Here is "Global Warming invented by the Nazis"<br />http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/02/the_nazi_origins_of_apocalypti.html<br /><br />And the "it is all a socialist plot" articles appear weekly, monthly? Here is one of the latest.<br />http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/09/its_all_about_system_change_to_socialism_not_climate_change.html<br /><br />And it is Godwin, not Goodwin.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00947172557558079020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-67129344628953181052015-10-25T14:33:49.085-04:002015-10-25T14:33:49.085-04:00Fernando, ferchrissake, you've written comment...Fernando, ferchrissake, you've written comments longer than that. Are you seriously telling us that you don't have the attention span to read 70 lines?<br /><br />Or is it Lewandowsky's 2 pages--including pictures.<br /><br />Pathetic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-13070004617037188062015-10-25T09:49:00.342-04:002015-10-25T09:49:00.342-04:00I suppose it was inevitable that with any article ...I suppose it was inevitable that with any article written by Dr. Lewandowsky, that the AGW denier clown car would rush straight over and dump Geoff Chambers and Barry Woods into the comments. Rog Tallbloke seems to be holding up the side well too, managing to seem dumber than Chambers and Woods combined. Loved "The oceans can't get below pH7 until the Earth runs out of rocks." straw man. Does he even know the scale is logarithmic?<br /><br />As usual, every time Dr. Lewandowsky writes something that shines a bright light under the climate change conspiracy theorists' rock, they show up in droves to help prove the very point he just made. Pure comedy gold, except the time to undertake a serious transition from fossil fuels to renewables is long overdue.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-65375919529430873902015-10-25T06:19:44.086-04:002015-10-25T06:19:44.086-04:00Return of the Red Queen indeed.
If Eli was at all ...Return of the Red Queen indeed.<br />If Eli was at all up to date he would know that this is a reference to the computer system that is fighting the Umbrella Corporation in one of those zombie movies.<br />You know the ones where denialist zombies become unstoppable until Stephan [right spelling this time yeah] links in with Alice and overcomes the Godwin's [right spelling again], using his unstoppable betting slips to overpower the evil conspiracy.<br />How they are related<br />Lewis Carrol Fantasy Author<br />C S Lewis Fantasy Author<br />S Lewindowsky Authorangechhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00843502144151902195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-70779633371821851652015-10-25T04:49:49.987-04:002015-10-25T04:49:49.987-04:00That post was too long. I couldn't even figure...That post was too long. I couldn't even figure out what the point was supposed to be for sure. Something about deniers lacking any scientific backing? Fernando Leanmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16085680730729620836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-65069475244734041872015-10-24T23:18:24.902-04:002015-10-24T23:18:24.902-04:00angech
SL "considers a sample of incoherent p...angech<br />SL "considers a sample of incoherent positions in detail. In allegiance to Lewis Carroll’s White Queen, who believes six impossible and contradictory things before breakfast, He refers to those states as “Alice through the Looking Glass” states."<br /><br />He states as an ultimate example<br /><br />"• It is a socialist plot but Nazis invented global warming." <br /><br />Proof?<br /><br />"It is notable that although contrarians readily claim that the Earth will be cooling in the future, most are unwilling to bet on their stated position."<br /><br />As Stefan so eloquently puts it, Goodwin done it. He wins the psychological argument, there and then and slam dunks it with the invincible scientific argument of all bets are off.<br /><br />The rabbet is in excellent company with arguments and examples like this.angechhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00843502144151902195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-43603302196444597852015-10-24T22:49:11.059-04:002015-10-24T22:49:11.059-04:00Very well put.Very well put.Tenney Naumerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11843130378338023902noreply@blogger.com