tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post3281541952706715847..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Steve Goddard steals Pat Michaels' trick of deleting inconvenient dataEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-76590034478666885592012-02-24T08:20:50.187-05:002012-02-24T08:20:50.187-05:00I hope you don't mind a repost of this on Real...I hope you don't mind a repost of this on Really Sciency;<br />http://reallysciency.blogspot.com/2012/02/steve-goddard-steals-pat-michaels-trick.htmlLazarushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14139033650731770470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-35910945742987845902012-02-21T01:54:35.667-05:002012-02-21T01:54:35.667-05:00Jay, I know you won't pay attention to anythin...Jay, I know you won't pay attention to anything I say, but I'd encourage you to read Celery Eater. While he's almost always wrong, he at least attempts to make an argument, react to evidence presented to him (sometimes - he likes to redirect as well), and provide contrary evidence. You're not meeting CE's standard.Brianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09301230860904555513noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-58745404933503045822012-02-20T15:41:40.767-05:002012-02-20T15:41:40.767-05:00Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
What are you talking about?...Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.<br /><br />What are you talking about? There are no differences in those graphs. This is the 2nd time in 2 weeks Eli has posted identical graphs and claimed a made up conspiracy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-29707688213568425012012-02-19T15:57:41.502-05:002012-02-19T15:57:41.502-05:00Regarding the title of the thread, this is nothing...Regarding the title of the thread, this is nothing new for Goddard. <br /><br /><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20100221140707/http://tamino.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/cherry-snow/" rel="nofollow">Cherry Snow</a> (Tamino)<br /><a href="http://rhinohide.wordpress.com/2010/02/27/steve-goddards-snowjob/" rel="nofollow">Goddards Snowjob</a> (Broberg)Ron Broberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00360356366869878444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-39983272090074482722012-02-19T12:53:31.244-05:002012-02-19T12:53:31.244-05:00Ok, I apologize to the worthy undertakers. Bacteri...Ok, I apologize to the worthy undertakers. Bacteria and maggots are admittedly vastly more useful and virtuous than Steven Goddard, more intelligent in their actions mindless though they are, more worthy of our praise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-25273989486811315102012-02-19T10:39:40.174-05:002012-02-19T10:39:40.174-05:00I agree about the biota of decomposition. It wasn&...I agree about the biota of decomposition. It wasn't for nothing that the Egyptians honored the scarab.Jeffrey Davishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17966839006518642902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-28668758929870746102012-02-19T06:31:12.440-05:002012-02-19T06:31:12.440-05:00And funnily enough...
Wiki - Anti-relativity
&qu...And funnily enough...<br /><br /><a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anti-relativity" rel="nofollow">Wiki - Anti-relativity</a><br /><br /><i>"<b>Objectivism</b><br /><br />Some Objectivists question or deny relativity as it doesn't fit neatly into Ayn Rand's metaphysical notions about causation (and is probably corrupted by dirty Kantian philosophy to boot).[2] The most notable Objectivist anti-relativist was Petr Beckmann, who attempted to replace it with a theory called "Galilean Electrodynamics.""</i>J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-59652527176635206232012-02-19T06:18:54.333-05:002012-02-19T06:18:54.333-05:00"Has human culture ever before produced the l..."Has human culture ever before produced the likes of Steven Goddard?"<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/features/print/1162/was-einstein-a-fake?page=0%2C0" rel="nofollow">anti-relativity movement?</a>J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-53780352259536056162012-02-19T06:16:16.976-05:002012-02-19T06:16:16.976-05:00Newer doc:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...Newer doc:<br /><br />https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:N-rEcyipRy4J:refmar.shom.fr/documents/10227/46536/07_InSitu_Calibration_TG_CLS_Janvier2012.pdf+&hl=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjLnCubOk7CP_mo0MEsw7k8YXyy3R86C3O4qT9onk_3UtGhOSBpnZV1lApLph8k3jaHARtQA4jXeqYqQwLggNstPIrtq5hqzD3qEDUCuGt18eIrnaVxg-9jAifCEen_UwWqOSq4&sig=AHIEtbQ2t3lyRWKxVZFTGjuj6OkJNtmUqw&pli=1<br /><br />still not what I was looking forMartin Vermeerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04537045395760606324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-14713676724653045332012-02-19T05:33:19.337-05:002012-02-19T05:33:19.337-05:00It so happens that Envisat has a very large altime...It so happens that Envisat has a very large altimeter drift, as can be determined by in-flight calibration. The Jasons and T/P are nearly free of drift.<br /><br />In-flight calibration is done by flying over the sea areas close to known tide gauges with permanent GPS time series, and comparing the altimetry and (GIA-reduced) tide gauge trends. A global set of tide gauges is used.<br /><br />See, e.g., this <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=valladeau%20cross-comparisons%20of%20sea%20surface%20height%20in-situ%20altimeter&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aviso.oceanobs.com%2Ffileadmin%2Fdocuments%2FOSTST%2F2011%2Fposter%2FPoster_OSTST_2011_CalvalInSitu_GValladeau%2526JFLegeais.pdf&ei=1MxAT6e2O4va4QS6uYjBCA&usg=AFQjCNGJ4NpckTXLbuhtzZhOQGP6qfOvFA&cad=rja" rel="nofollow">presentation</a>. (There is a better paper but I cannot find it now.)<br /><br />Brian, the IB correction averages to zero long-term but will reduce variability a bit. The seasonal correction is a must. And of course GIA is a good idea though it's only 0.3 mm/yr.Martin Vermeerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04537045395760606324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-23504385818457451142012-02-19T05:28:34.562-05:002012-02-19T05:28:34.562-05:00The biota of decomposition have been, yet again, s...The biota of decomposition have been, yet again, sorely misunderstood and gravely under appreciated !!<br /><br />Those creatures fulfill their purpose constantly, tirelessly and accurately.<br /><br />This biota of decomposition is not to be impugned simply because an individual of the self-proclaimed "highest life form" fails obviously, miserably (and, perhaps, aggressively) at his own presumed purpose.<br /><br />John PumaJohnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12479974040070719985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-29200799086669806062012-02-19T04:40:23.783-05:002012-02-19T04:40:23.783-05:00The problem with the Envisat altimeter is that it ...The problem with the Envisat altimeter is that it has an unusually large drift, which should be removed by in-flight calibration. T/P and the Jasons don't have this problem, as also verified by in-flight calibration.<br /><br />In-flight cal is done by flying over known GPS-positioned tide gauges, and comparing altimetry/tide gauge data trends.<br /><br />There is at least one good paper on this, but I'm on the move using a tablet PC and have difficulty finding it.<br /><br />Brian yes, IB correction zeroes out long term, but applying it reduces the noise level somewhat. The seasonal reduction is a must.<br /><br />Martin VermeerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-45606408080125607372012-02-19T04:01:35.635-05:002012-02-19T04:01:35.635-05:00Has human culture ever before produced the likes o...Has human culture ever before produced the likes of Steven Goddard? Could it, before the Enlightenment providing such a rich feeding ground for the hungry obtuse? Here is a person exemplifying a population that cannot directly metabolize scientific enlightenment in pursuit of synthesizing even great achievements but must instead break ideas and concepts down into disharmonious fragments, shatter music into noise, fragrance into stink, intricate structure into liquifying putrefaction.<br /><br />As a member of the biota of decomposition, where does Goddard in particular best fit? Aerobic or anaerobic bacteria? Maggot?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com