tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post2540427584051790662..comments2024-03-18T03:27:18.777-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: Annoying the AuditorsEliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger73125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-10676468927973570402018-01-11T06:16:45.634-05:002018-01-11T06:16:45.634-05:00ielts institute in ludhiana is one of the most rep...ielts institute in ludhiana is one of the most reputed company which gives the best results of ielts coaching.<a href="http://www.thevisasolutions.com/ielts" rel="nofollow"> Ielts institute in Ludhiana</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17425273792188495087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-56826318566135963252013-02-11T16:31:20.654-05:002013-02-11T16:31:20.654-05:00Don't know how this post snuck under my radar....Don't know how this post snuck under my radar. I'm a habitual consumer of the Rabett droppings :-)<br /><br />Delighted to see that more and more somebunnies are bringing up the excellent work by Deep Climate every time some AGW denier brings up McI's 'critique' of that seminal 15-year old MBH paper and/or the Wegman report. The point really needs to be driven home time and again that McIntyre is nothing more than a serial cheater. His archived data and R code for MM05 is on-line for all to behold. Yep, he way overcooked the 'red noise' persistence and then did a 1% cherry pick. But the AGW deniers see nothing wrong with that. What hypocritical arseclowns they are.<br /><br />I doubt any one of the deniers has read through Deep Climate's analysis, at least not for comprehension. Having to come to grips with it would cause their little brains to explode, even with the cognitive dissonance armour they must carry around. I'll bet it weighs a lot.metzomagicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-56454424437201700612013-01-12T13:49:00.838-05:002013-01-12T13:49:00.838-05:00Anonymous troll @9:36 AM:
"dhogaza, will[sic...Anonymous troll @9:36 AM:<br /><br />"dhogaza, will[sic] all do[sic] respect I asked Eli to answer, not you. Manners please."<br /><br />Anonymous troll @11:20 AM:<br /><br />"hahahaha the irony it burns.[sick[sic]]"<br /><br />Oh, how it burns. Mal Adaptedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06123525780458234978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-24553221995701649952013-01-12T13:41:30.771-05:002013-01-12T13:41:30.771-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Mal Adaptedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06123525780458234978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-18096527507854425422013-01-11T21:20:10.146-05:002013-01-11T21:20:10.146-05:00It may displease the tribunes of the lumpenspooke...It may displease the tribunes of the lumpenspooketoothiat to learn that Bishop Hill descends from the <a href="http://www.lib.niu.edu/1999/iht6299022a.jpg" rel="nofollow"> hardy authors of the medieval warm runestone unearthed in Illinois.</a><br />THE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-34372925875543208672013-01-11T12:33:33.930-05:002013-01-11T12:33:33.930-05:00Fellatio, too.Fellatio, too.willardhttp://neverendingaudit.tumblr.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-56440186846432857662013-01-11T07:35:07.063-05:002013-01-11T07:35:07.063-05:00"denialatus"??
Misspelling, surely. Tha..."denialatus"??<br /><br />Misspelling, surely. That "t" has to be an "n"!<br /><br /><i>Cymraeg llygoden</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-23943211766239118252013-01-11T06:22:20.134-05:002013-01-11T06:22:20.134-05:00"Still fighting the cold war "
What eve..."Still fighting the cold war "<br /><br />What ever for, Neven? We won.THE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-14145485702442714562013-01-11T01:05:22.522-05:002013-01-11T01:05:22.522-05:00"FYI, the UEA hack was illegal."
Really...<i>"FYI, the UEA hack was illegal."<br /><br />Really? Who was prosecuted and convicted in court of this illegal act?</i><br /><br />Ah, the unfailing logical fallatio of the denialatus.<br /><br />By this reasoning the Ripper murders were not crimes.<br /><br /><i>Nigel Persaud was convicted of libel?</i><br /><br />If Nigel Persaud were to try libeling Mann now, I'd say that Nige would be spending a lot of time on the 'phone with Tim Ball, swapping notes.<br /><br /><i>"Making death threats is also frowned upon by the police, but the authorities have not released the identity of the individuals making the threats."<br /><br />Because there has not been any death threats.</i><br /><br />Really? How do you know this? Have you a source monitoring the communications of every climate investigator?<br /><br />For your information (although I doubt that it would stick or even slow down on the short journey in one ear and out the other) I've been personally threatened with grievous bodily harm by a denialist on a non-climate forum where I post under a different name. The threat was repeated several times over several days, and it was sufficiently serious that I had to cancel attendance at a national meeting where the denialist said he was going to find me. One of his comments was to the effect that he would not lose sleep if his beating rendered me comatose or worse. And all <i>I</i> was doing was pointing out the evidence supporting real science, and debunking denialist clap-trap.<br /><br />The moderator deleted the posts when they were brought to his attention. Unfortunately that was before I learned the habit of archiving, otherwise I would have frozen them on at archive.org for posterity.<br /><br />More generally, death threats have been taken sufficiently on the evidence supplied by Australian researchers that their institutions have had to instigate safety measures to exclude unfettered public access. <br /><br /><br />Bernard J.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71930637010797522282013-01-10T17:48:29.435-05:002013-01-10T17:48:29.435-05:00Anonymouse over the picture:) Anonymouse over the picture:) EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-51736085948484091502013-01-10T17:34:24.216-05:002013-01-10T17:34:24.216-05:00I only recognize Brashear, Eli.
Who's the Pan...I only recognize Brashear, Eli.<br /><br />Who's the Panthers' pugilist?willardhttp://neverendingaudit.tumblr.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-6133727128599617532013-01-10T16:35:24.680-05:002013-01-10T16:35:24.680-05:00People like Neven are scary, wanting to round peop...<i>People like Neven are scary, wanting to round people up and charging them with crimes for voicing an opinion.</i><br /><br />Let's say that in the next 10 years the evidence that AGW will be a problem that will cost money and lives, how, my dear friend, will that reflect on the 'work' of fake skeptics?<br /><br />I think it could be labeled criminal by then, but I don't really care whether they go to jail for it or have to pay a fine. I just hope that they realize what they have done.<br /><br />But it's very simple that when it turns out that AGW is real and problematic, fake skeptics have a problem. If they still live by then, because almost all of them are old. Still fighting the Cold War.Nevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15413215743703093876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-31181660650480145382013-01-10T11:02:52.395-05:002013-01-10T11:02:52.395-05:00People like Neven are scary, wanting to round peop...People like Neven are scary, wanting to round people up and charging them with crimes for voicing an opinion.<br /><br />I know I know all the lemmings will defend Neven's most alarmiong post, that is what lemmings do.<br /><br /><br />You mean Mann lied? How shocking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-71982902544223965912013-01-10T10:44:30.120-05:002013-01-10T10:44:30.120-05:00"When the PCA methodology is correctly used, ..."When the PCA methodology is correctly used, the hockey stick essentially disappears"<br /><br /><br />You mean ... Wegman lied? How shocking ...<br />dhogazanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-17191898042795044072013-01-10T06:30:42.623-05:002013-01-10T06:30:42.623-05:00Precedent: Big Tobacco Guilty As ChargedPrecedent: <a href="http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/what_we_do/industry_watch/doj_lawsuit/" rel="nofollow">Big Tobacco Guilty As Charged</a>J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-32000873131827915742013-01-10T04:31:00.527-05:002013-01-10T04:31:00.527-05:00Really? Who was prosecuted and convicted in court ...<i>Really? Who was prosecuted and convicted in court of this illegal act?</i><br /><br />The police force investigating the CRU hack has stated unequivocally that it was a criminal act. The notion that something cannot be considered a crime unless someone has been convicted for it is somewhat odd - AFAIK they never caught the people who broke into my house and stole my car but I'm pretty sure it was still a criminal act.<br /><br />OTOH, if you have a case where someone openly admits their actions yet the authorities decline to take any action then claims of criminal activity are much more open to question. andrew adamsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-15519165759246467892013-01-10T02:20:05.763-05:002013-01-10T02:20:05.763-05:00Deniers have acted illegally? Who please name name...<i>Deniers have acted illegally? Who please name names.</i><br /><br />Evidence of the crime is still being collected. Once AGW turns out to be a real problem after all (surprise!), costing lots of money and lives, people like Nigel and his fellow chummers will have a big, big problem.<br /><br />Perhaps you, full-of-crap-denier-lemming, could be on the list as well, but a lawyer would probably recommend: best you remain anonymous, lest you incriminate yourself. Anything you say, can and will be used against you.Nevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15413215743703093876noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-44689614293973923402013-01-10T00:46:49.761-05:002013-01-10T00:46:49.761-05:00Since Wegman and PCA have been mentioned, I bring ...Since Wegman and PCA have been mentioned, I bring yet another Wegman carrot. Wegman had an interesting habit of speaking differently to audiences unlikely to contain experts. For instance, see 03/21/07 talk in <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20090415000000*/http://www1.aucegypt.edu/academic/math/events.html" rel="nofollow">events @ AUC, Wegman on 'reanalysis'</a>. The abstract was <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20090403115008/http://www1.aucegypt.edu/academic/math/documents/Dr.Edward_Abstract.doc" rel="nofollow">this</a>.<br />Bunnies might want to read that carefully, especially:<br /><br />'Their methodology incorrectly used a principal component-like analysis. When the PCA methodology is correctly used, the hockey stick essentially disappears ( i.e. the rapid rise from 1850 disappears. The change in mean global temperature is approximate .7 degrees centigrade over 150 years. We discuss this and other statistical faults with the paleoclimate reconstructions.'John Masheynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-44558871236335965842013-01-09T23:52:10.664-05:002013-01-09T23:52:10.664-05:00Eli and Nigel go back a LONG wayEli and Nigel go back a LONG wayEliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-37894555285644633692013-01-09T23:13:55.732-05:002013-01-09T23:13:55.732-05:00I do take issue with something said in this post, ...I do take issue with something said in this post, he refers to Nigel Persaud/McIntyre and the giddy Bishop as "auditors". They are not legitimate auditors, not even remotely so. The post should have been titled "Annoying the chummers" ;)<br /><br />AGU bunnyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-26615742733659973042013-01-09T21:54:28.396-05:002013-01-09T21:54:28.396-05:00This thread has turned to the right:
http://za.fot...This thread has turned to the right:<br />http://za.fotolia.com/id/41003550David B. Bensonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02917182411282836875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-53316167902862792462013-01-09T19:16:44.293-05:002013-01-09T19:16:44.293-05:00Finally, ty Bowers, now may we return to Gleick.
...Finally, ty Bowers, now may we return to Gleick.<br /><br /><br /><br />Lemmings.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-20366916050838998022013-01-09T19:09:20.491-05:002013-01-09T19:09:20.491-05:00"Really? Who was prosecuted and convicted in ...<i>"Really? Who was prosecuted and convicted in court of this illegal act?"</i><br /><br />Only in Halfwitland could a corpse be found tied to a chair with their fingernails pulled out, a hood over their head, their throat slit; but it couldn't be murder because a murderer hadn't been found to prosecute and convict.J Bowersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-25292541215180106112013-01-09T18:45:24.876-05:002013-01-09T18:45:24.876-05:00And there is the poor confused fool who thinks he ...And there is the poor confused fool who thinks he is living in the world of a comic strip.<br /><br />Is there a doctor in the house to help this poor soul?<br /><br />FWIW I am not the same person who brought up the 15 year old paper. I already know all the talking point replies that the lemmings have memorized for that topic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-17963569819765936302013-01-09T18:08:52.319-05:002013-01-09T18:08:52.319-05:00I'm a little worried about anonytroll. He see...I'm a little worried about anonytroll. He seems to be spiraling down ever deeper into depths of incoherence. His rather unhealthy obsession with 15 year old papers and their authors seems to have him thinking everyone is as stupid as he is. Sad, really. But, hey, since I don't know who the poor bloke is...pass the popcorn.a_ray_in_dilbert_spacenoreply@blogger.com