tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post116087574644056297..comments2024-03-19T03:14:04.172-04:00Comments on Rabett Run: EliRabetthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-1160960968913906982006-10-15T21:09:00.000-04:002006-10-15T21:09:00.000-04:00Ah, it is even worse, not Lomborgism, but Lomborgi...Ah, it is even worse, not Lomborgism, but Lomborgianism. Lomborgianism is a diversion and he can't even get that right. The biggest joke is that the Danish government did not accept the verdict of scientific dishonesty about his work because they said is was not science. We agree. For further comments on my position see: <A HREF="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/10/meta-denial.html" REL="nofollow"> meta denial</A>.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16612221.post-1160938153875052462006-10-15T14:49:00.000-04:002006-10-15T14:49:00.000-04:00Just curious,What is the worst application of scie...Just curious,<BR/><BR/>What is the worst application of science Lomborg shown? He says: "Our oceans have not been defiled" in his book. So I point to the fact that 90% of big ocean fish are gone, CO2 driven ocean acidification, bleaching corals, and this video showing that theres not enough fish so people are going after jellyfish:<BR/><BR/>http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans-flash-day1,0,7544983.flash<BR/><BR/>Can you think of anything better? If a man has an insulting word like "lomborgism" assigned to his name surely there is a very clear and precise way to make your point. Yes, I agree with your post but it certainly doesn't work on your typical uneducated skeptic.M.J. S. - (Wacki)https://www.blogger.com/profile/14985820536142090350noreply@blogger.com